Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 68 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Reviewed as evidence on: Statin / lipid-lowering use (incl. CETP inhibitors) and dementia incidence 5 studies (what the news said). Being listed means the study bears on the question, not that it agrees with the news.

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background Dementia affects an estimated 10% of the population older than 65 years. Because vascular and lipid-related mechanisms are thought to have a role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia, we did an epidemiological study of the potential effect of HMGCoA (3 hydroxy-3methylglutaryl-coenzyme A) reductase inhibitors (statins) and other lipid-lowering agents on dementia. Methods We used a nested case-control design with information derived from 368 practices which contribute to the UK-based General Practice Research Database. The base study population included three groups of patients age 50 years and older: all individuals who had received lipid-lowering agents (LLAs); all individuals with a clinical diagnosis of untreated hyperlipidaemia; and a randomly selected group of other individuals. From this base population, all cases with a computer-recorded clinical diagnosis of dementia were identified. Each case was matched with up to four controls derived from the base population on age, sex, practice, and index date of case. Findings The study encompassed 284 cases with dementia and 1080 controls. Among controls 13% had untreated hyperlipidaemia, 11% were prescribed statins, 7% other LLAs, and 69% had no hyperlipidaemia or LLA exposure. The relative risk estimates of dementia adjusted for age, sex, history of coronary-artery disease, hypertension, coronary-bypass surgery and cerebral ischaemia, smoking and body mass index for individuals with untreated hyperlipidaemia (odds ratio 0.72 [95% CI 0.45-1.14]), or treated with nonstatin LLAs (0.96 [0.47-1.97], was close to 1.0 and not significant compared with people who had no diagnosis of hyperlipidaemia or exposure to other lipid-lowering drugs. The adjusted relative risk for those prescribed statins was 0.29 (0.13-0.63; p=0.002). Interpretation Individuals of 50 years and older who were prescribed statins had a substantially lowered risk of developing dementia, independent of the presence or absence of untreated hyperlipidaemia, or exposure to nonstatin LLAs. The available data do not distinguish between Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Jick, H., Zornberg, G. L., Jick, S. S., Seshadri, S., & Drachman, D. A. (2000). Statins and the risk of dementia. Lancet (London, England). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03155-x

Vancouver

Jick H, Zornberg GL, Jick SS, Seshadri S, Drachman DA. Statins and the risk of dementia. Lancet (London, England). 2000. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03155-x. PMID: 11089820.

BibTeX

@article{jick2000-11089820,
  author  = {Jick, H. and Zornberg, G. L. and Jick, S. S. and Seshadri, S. and Drachman, D. A.},
  title   = {{Statins and the risk of dementia}},
  journal = {Lancet (London, England)},
  year    = {2000},
  doi     = {10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03155-x},
  pmid    = {11089820},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03155-x}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In UK GP records covering 284 people with dementia and 1,080 matched controls aged 50 and over, people prescribed statins had a lower risk of a dementia diagnosis (adjusted relative risk 0.29, 95% CI 0.13–0.63). People taking other cholesterol-lowering drugs, and people with untreated high cholesterol, showed no significant difference. This is an observational case-control study, so it shows an association rather than proof that statins prevent dementia, and the authors note their data could not separate Alzheimer's disease from other dementias.

Study details

How this study scored 68/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 10 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 6 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 7 of 7; Citations per year 5 of 5; Impact for its field and year 6 of 6; Cited by studies here 4 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 65 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 68 of 100. Total 68 of 100.65 of the 96 points we could judge = 68 of 100

Published in a top-tier journal, and it is a case-control study. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 65 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 68 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 10 / 10 Tier 1 — top-tier general journal (Lancet (London, England))
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 The Lancet: journal h-index 1,205 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 6 / 12 A case-control study
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2000 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 7 / 7 Cited 1,766 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 5 / 5 63.1 citations a year over 28 year(s) since 2000
Impact for its field and year 6 / 6 Cited 121.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 4 / 6 Cited by 78 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 47 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author DA Drachman holds only 7 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Harvard University: institution h-index 3,235 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 11089820)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 65 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 65 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 68 out of 100.
Total 68 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

78 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “statin-lipid-lowering-and-dementia”

5 studies in the library carry the topic tag “statin-lipid-lowering-and-dementia”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 5 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →