Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 37 out of 100. Disease mechanisms

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

The amyloid hypothesis is the predominant model of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis, suggesting that amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide is the primary driver of neurotoxicity and a cascade of pathological events in the central nervous system. Aβ aggregation into oligomers and deposits triggers various processes, such as vascular damage, inflammation-induced astrocyte and microglia activation, disrupted neuronal ionic homeostasis, oxidative stress, abnormal kinase and phosphatase activity, tau phosphorylation, neurofibrillary tangle formation, cognitive dysfunction, synaptic loss, cell death, and, ultimately, dementia. Molecular dynamics (MD) is a powerful structure-based drug design (SBDD) approach that aids in understanding the properties, functions, and mechanisms of action or inhibition of biomolecules. As the only method capable of simulating atomic-level internal motions, MD provides unique insights that cannot be obtained through other techniques. Integrating experimental data with MD simulations allows for a more comprehensive understanding of biological processes and molecular interactions. This review summarizes and evaluates MD studies from the past decade on small molecules, including endogenous compounds and repurposed drugs, that inhibit amyloid beta. Furthermore, it outlines key considerations for future MD simulations of amyloid inhibitors, offering a potential framework for studies aimed at elucidating the mechanisms of amyloid beta inhibition by small molecules.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Atanasova, M. (2025). Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Amyloid Beta: Insights from Molecular Dynamics—Part A: Endogenous Compounds and Repurposed Drugs. Pharmaceuticals. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18030306

Vancouver

Atanasova M. Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Amyloid Beta: Insights from Molecular Dynamics—Part A: Endogenous Compounds and Repurposed Drugs. Pharmaceuticals. 2025. doi:10.3390/ph18030306. PMID: 40143085.

BibTeX

@article{atanasova2025-40143085,
  author  = {Atanasova, Mariyana},
  title   = {{Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Amyloid Beta: Insights from Molecular Dynamics—Part A: Endogenous Compounds and Repurposed Drugs}},
  journal = {Pharmaceuticals},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.3390/ph18030306},
  pmid    = {40143085},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18030306}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review summarizes molecular dynamics studies of small molecules, including endogenous compounds and repurposed drugs, that inhibit amyloid beta. It is a computational drug-design review and reports no clinical treatment, cure or prevention results.

Study details

How this study scored 37/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 37 of 100.37 of 100 points earned63 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Pharmaceuticals)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Pharmaceuticals: journal h-index 146 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 9 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 9 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Mariyana Atanasova: h-index 17 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Medical University of Sofia: institution h-index 235 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40143085)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 37 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Disease mechanisms

Also tagged “precursor”

1,337 studies in the library carry the topic tag “precursor”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,337 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Disease mechanisms

See all studies in Disease mechanisms →