Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 33 out of 100. Disease mechanisms

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, characterized by progressive memory loss and cognitive decline. Its key pathological hallmarks include extracellular amyloid plaques composed of amyloid beta (Aβ) peptides and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles formed by hyperphosphorylated tau protein. Although numerous studies have investigated the complex pathology of AD, its underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. The amyloid cascade hypothesis continues to be the leading model of AD pathogenesis. It suggests that Aβ aggregation is the initial trigger of neurotoxicity, setting off a cascade of pathological events including inflammation, oxidative stress, tau hyperphosphorylation, synaptic dysfunction, and, ultimately, dementia. Molecular dynamics (MD) is a powerful tool in structure-based drug design (SBDD). By simulating biomolecular motions at the atomic level, MD provides unique insights into molecular properties, functions, and inhibition mechanisms-insights often inaccessible through other experimental or computational techniques. When integrated with experimental data, MD further deepens our understanding of molecular interactions and biological processes. Natural compounds, known for their pleiotropic pharmacological activities, favorable safety profiles, and general tolerability (despite occasional side effects), are increasingly explored for their potential in both the treatment and prevention of various diseases, including AD. In this review, we summarize current findings from MD simulations of natural compounds with anti-amyloidogenic potential. This work builds upon our previous publication, which focused on endogenous compounds and repurposed drugs. The review is structured as follows: an overview of the amyloid cascade hypothesis; a discussion of Aβ oligomeric structures and their stabilizing interactions; a section on molecular dynamics, including its challenges and future directions; and a comprehensive analysis of the inhibitory mechanisms of natural compounds, categorized by their shared structural features.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Atanasova, M. (2025). Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Amyloid Beta: Insights from Molecular Dynamics—Part B: Natural Compounds. Pharmaceuticals. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18101457

Vancouver

Atanasova M. Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Amyloid Beta: Insights from Molecular Dynamics—Part B: Natural Compounds. Pharmaceuticals. 2025. doi:10.3390/ph18101457. PMID: 41155570.

BibTeX

@article{atanasova2025-41155570,
  author  = {Atanasova, Mariyana},
  title   = {{Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Amyloid Beta: Insights from Molecular Dynamics—Part B: Natural Compounds}},
  journal = {Pharmaceuticals},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.3390/ph18101457},
  pmid    = {41155570},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18101457}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review discusses how molecular dynamics simulations are used to study natural compounds that might block amyloid-beta aggregation, based on the idea that amyloid-beta clumping starts the disease process. It is a computational and review-based work, so it does not show that any compound prevents or treats Alzheimer's in people.

Study details

How this study scored 33/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 33 of 100.33 of 100 points earned67 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Pharmaceuticals)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Pharmaceuticals: journal h-index 146 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 4 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 4 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Mariyana Atanasova: h-index 17 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Medical University of Sofia: institution h-index 235 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41155570)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 33 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 17.

Related studies in Disease mechanisms

Also tagged “precursor”

1,337 studies in the library carry the topic tag “precursor”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,337 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Disease mechanisms

See all studies in Disease mechanisms →