Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 38 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Increasing costs of institutional care for the aged have occasioned a variety of government cost containment measures. People with senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type (SDAT) will be the principal group to suffer from cutbacks. SDAT patients are usually eligible for Intermediate Care Facilities (ICFs), rather than Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) and therefore for lower reimbursement. Because such patients require heavy care and are the ones most likely to be Medicaid-dependent, nursing homes are being provided with incentives to prevent admissions. At the same time, community services to aid overburdened caregivers are grossly inadequate. Costs to other parts of the health systems are increased by backups in acute hospitals when nursing home beds cannot be found. SDAT and Medicaid eligibility are the principal causes of such "administratively necessary" backup days, but in the main Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs) may close even that temporary resource. Thus, virtually all avenues of care are shrinking for those who need them most.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Brody, E., Lawton, M. P., & Liebowitz, B. (1984). Senile dementia: public policy and adequate institutional care. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.74.12.1381

Vancouver

Brody E, Lawton MP, Liebowitz B. Senile dementia: public policy and adequate institutional care. American Journal of Public Health. 1984. doi:10.2105/ajph.74.12.1381. PMID: 6439060.

BibTeX

@article{brody1984-6439060,
  author  = {Brody, Elaine and Lawton, M. Powell and Liebowitz, Bernard},
  title   = {{Senile dementia: public policy and adequate institutional care}},
  journal = {American Journal of Public Health},
  year    = {1984},
  doi     = {10.2105/ajph.74.12.1381},
  pmid    = {6439060},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.74.12.1381}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This policy paper argues that cost containment measures and inadequate community services are shrinking care options for people with senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type. It concerns institutional care policy and funding, not treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 38/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 38 of 100.38 of 100 points earned62 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (American Journal of Public Health)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 American Journal of Public Health: journal h-index 422 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1984 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 50 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.1 citations a year over 44 year(s) since 1984
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 16.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Bernard Liebowitz: h-index 7 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Institute of Behavioral Sciences: institution h-index 50 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 6439060)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 38 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,223 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,223 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →