Home › Research › Brain scans and imaging
Retinal nerve fiber layer structure abnormalities in early Alzheimer's disease: evidence in optical coherence tomography
Lu Y, Li Z, Zhang X, Ming B, Jia J, Wang R, Ma D.. Neuroscience letters, 2010-06-08
Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers
Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients often have visual disorders which may be due to retinal nerve degenerative changes. The aim of the current study was to determine the thickness changes of retina nerve fibers with optical coherence tomography (OCT) in AD patients. The OCT was used to assess the thickness of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) from 22 AD patients and 22 healthy age-matched controls. The corrected visual acuity and intraocular pressure were measured and the dilated fundus examination and fundus image acquisition were also performed in those subjects. Compared with healthy age-matched controls, the RNFL thickness of AD patients were much thinner (p<0.05), especially in supra-retina and infra-retina, while no difference was found in the other retinal area. These changes were also confirmed by the fundus images. In conclusion, retinal nerve degeneration is present in the retina of AD patients and this degeneration is likely localized preferentially to the superior and inferior quadrant.
Key findings
- Compared with healthy age-matched controls, the RNFL thickness of AD patients were much thinner (p<0.05), especially in supra-retina and infra-retina, while no difference was found in the other retinal area.
- In conclusion, retinal nerve degeneration is present in the retina of AD patients and this degeneration is likely localized preferentially to the superior and inferior quadrant.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Brain scans & tests →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neuroscience letters) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2010 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 20609426) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Lu, Y., Li, Z., Zhang, X., Ming, B., Jia, J., Wang, R., et al. (2010). Retinal nerve fiber layer structure abnormalities in early Alzheimer's disease: evidence in optical coherence tomography. Neuroscience letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.006
Vancouver
Lu Y, Li Z, Zhang X, Ming B, Jia J, Wang R, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer structure abnormalities in early Alzheimer's disease: evidence in optical coherence tomography. Neuroscience letters. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.006. PMID: 20609426.
BibTeX
@article{lu2010-20609426,
author = {Lu, Y. and Li, Z. and Zhang, X. and Ming, B. and Jia, J. and Wang, R. and Ma, D.},
title = {{Retinal nerve fiber layer structure abnormalities in early Alzheimer's disease: evidence in optical coherence tomography}},
journal = {Neuroscience letters},
year = {2010},
doi = {10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.006},
pmid = {20609426},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.006}
}