Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 62 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Background Retinal microvascular alterations, detectable via color fundus photography (CFP), may reflect cerebral microvascular pathology in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, their associations with blood-based biomarkers and cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) remain unclear. Methods This cross-sectional study included 72 AD patients and 82 cognitively unimpaired (CU) controls. Participants underwent CFP, plasma biomarker analysis (amyloid beta [Aβ]42, Aβ42/40, phosphorylated tau [p-tau]181, p-tau217), and 3T magnetic resonance imaging. Retinal microvascular metrics (vessel density [VD], fractal dimension [FD]) were analyzed alongside SVD markers (white matter hyperintensities [WMHs], SVD burden) and medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA). Results AD patients exhibited significantly reduced VD and FD compared to CU (all p < 0.001), with strong diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve: 0.969 for VD; 0.904 for FD). Retinal microvascular impairment correlated with plasma biomarkers (lower Aβ42, Aβ42/40; elevated p-tau181, p-tau217; all p < 0.05) and neuroimaging markers of SVD (WMHs, MTA; all p < 0.05). Apolipoprotein E ε4 carriers showed more severe retinal microvascular damage (p < 0.001). Discussion Retinal microvascular alterations, assayed via CFP, are linked to AD-specific proteinopathy and cerebrovascular pathology, supporting CFP as a scalable, non-invasive tool for AD biomarker discovery. Highlights Retinal microvasculature assayed via color fundus photography (CFP) is sensitive to microvascular damage and can differentiate Alzheimer's disease (AD) from cognitively unimpaired controls. Retinal microvascular damage in AD is associated with phosphorylated tau [p-tau]181, p-tau217, p-tau217/amyloid beta (Aβ)42, and increased amyloid burden (lower Aβ42 and Aβ42/40). Retinal microvascular damage in AD is associated with increased cerebral small vessel burden.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Kwapong, W. R., Wu, N., Lin, W., Shen, J., Wang, Y., Qian, J., et al. (2025). Retinal microvascular alterations in Alzheimer's disease: Linking blood plasma biomarkers and cerebral small vessel pathology. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70745

Vancouver

Kwapong WR, Wu N, Lin W, Shen J, Wang Y, Qian J, et al. Retinal microvascular alterations in Alzheimer's disease: Linking blood plasma biomarkers and cerebral small vessel pathology. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz.70745. PMID: 41065118.

BibTeX

@article{kwapong2025-41065118,
  author  = {Kwapong, W. R. and Wu, N. and Lin, W. and Shen, J. and Wang, Y. and Qian, J. and Wen, C. and Luan, X. and others},
  title   = {{Retinal microvascular alterations in Alzheimer's disease: Linking blood plasma biomarkers and cerebral small vessel pathology}},
  journal = {Alzheimer's \& dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.70745},
  pmid    = {41065118},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70745}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 62/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 36 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 62 of 100. Total 62 of 100.36 of the 58 points we could judge = 62 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 36 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 62 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 72 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41065118)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 36 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 36 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 62 out of 100.
Total 62 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “alterations”

4 studies in the library carry the topic tag “alterations”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 4 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →