Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Although previous studies demonstrated decreased functional connectivity in the default mode network in the cognitively normal older adults with amyloid burden, effects of amyloid burden in the other large-scale intrinsic connectivity networks are not yet clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the distinctive association pattern of amyloid-β deposition on the three large-scale intrinsic connectivity networks (the default mode network, salience network and central executive network) in older adults with normal cognition. Fifty-six older adults with normal cognition underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging and were dichotomized using 11C-labelled Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography imaging into subjects with (PiB+; n=27) and without (PiB-; n=29) detectable amyloid burden. We found that the functional connectivities of (i) the default mode network were greater; (ii) the salience network were not different; and (iii) the central executive network were lower in the Pittsburgh compound B positive group, compared with the Pittsburgh compound B negative group. Anterior cingulate cortex Pittsburgh compound B retention was negatively correlated with the functional connectivities of the posterior default mode network, and positively correlated with fronto-parietal functional connectivity (within the central executive network) in the Pittsburgh compound B positive group. The anti-correlation strength between the default mode network and the central executive network was negatively correlated with the anterior cingulate cortex Pittsburgh compound B levels. Additionally, significant group × episodic memory interactions with functional connectivities in the posterior default mode network, and the frontal default mode network were observed. Our results of aberrant default mode network functional connectivity and distinctive correlation patterns between the Pittsburgh compound B retention in the anterior cingulate cortex and functional connectivities in the default mode network and central executive network in the Pittsburgh compound B positive group might reflect a detrimental effect of amyloid retention on functional changes in the course of Alzheimer's disease progression.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Lim, H. K., Nebes, R., Snitz, B., Cohen, A., Mathis, C., Price, J., et al. (2014). Regional amyloid burden and intrinsic connectivity networks in cognitively normal elderly subjects. Brain : a journal of neurology. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu271

Vancouver

Lim HK, Nebes R, Snitz B, Cohen A, Mathis C, Price J, et al. Regional amyloid burden and intrinsic connectivity networks in cognitively normal elderly subjects. Brain : a journal of neurology. 2014. doi:10.1093/brain/awu271. PMID: 25266592.

BibTeX

@article{lim2014-25266592,
  author  = {Lim, H. K. and Nebes, R. and Snitz, B. and Cohen, A. and Mathis, C. and Price, J. and Weissfeld, L. and Klunk, W. and others},
  title   = {{Regional amyloid burden and intrinsic connectivity networks in cognitively normal elderly subjects}},
  journal = {Brain : a journal of neurology},
  year    = {2014},
  doi     = {10.1093/brain/awu271},
  pmid    = {25266592},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu271}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 47/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 27 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 47 of 100. Total 47 of 100.27 of the 58 points we could judge = 47 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 27 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 47 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Brain : a journal of neurology)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2014 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 27 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 25266592)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 27 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 27 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 47 out of 100.
Total 47 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Also tagged “connectivity-network”

2 studies in the library carry the topic tag “connectivity-network”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 2 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →