Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100. Brain tissue and pathology

Topic: Inflammation, microglia and astrocytes

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is widely recognized as a multifactorial disorder involving neurovascular and glial dysfunction beyond amyloid-β and tau pathology. In this Perspective, we synthesize recent evidence to propose a conceptual framework linking transactive response (TAR) DNA-binding protein 43 kDa (TDP-43) to neurovascular unit (NVU) disruption in AD. Traditionally considered a neuronal co-pathology, TDP-43 also aggregates in astrocytes and endothelial cells, impairing blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity, glymphatic clearance, and metabolic homeostasis. Endothelial TDP-43 loss disrupts β-catenin signaling and fibronectin, triggering vascular breakdown and neuroinflammation. Astrocytic perivascular aggregates correlate with reduced aquaporin-4 (AQP4) and CD146, further compromising clearance pathways. These vascular-glial mechanisms may accelerate AD progression and help explain clinical heterogeneity and limited therapeutic response in TDP-43-positive patients. We argue for the reclassification of TDP-43 as a potential upstream driver of disease progression. Such a shift would support the development of integrative biomarkers and precision treatment strategies targeting NVU dysfunction. HIGHLIGHTS: Transactive response (TAR) DNA-binding protein 43 kDa (TDP-43) may act as a driver of neurovascular dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We propose reclassifying TDP-43 from co-pathology to upstream contributor. TDP-43 affects endothelial cells and astrocytes, disrupting blood-brain barrier (BBB) and clearance. Neurovascular unit (NVU) dysfunction links TDP-43 to inflammation, hypoperfusion, and cognitive decline. A vascular-glial model of AD opens new therapeutic and biomarker opportunities.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Di Donna, M. G., Motta, C., Bonomi, C. G., Bernocchi, F., Ricci, F., Poli, M., et al. (2025). Reframing TDP-43 in Alzheimer's disease: From co-pathology to neurovascular culprit. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70988

Vancouver

Di Donna MG, Motta C, Bonomi CG, Bernocchi F, Ricci F, Poli M, et al. Reframing TDP-43 in Alzheimer's disease: From co-pathology to neurovascular culprit. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz.70988. PMID: 41399037.

BibTeX

@article{didonna2025-41399037,
  author  = {Di Donna, Martina Gaia and Motta, Caterina and Bonomi, Chiara Giuseppina and Bernocchi, Francesca and Ricci, Francesco and Poli, Martina and Koch, Giacomo and Martorana, Alessandro},
  title   = {{Reframing TDP-43 in Alzheimer's disease: From co-pathology to neurovascular culprit}},
  journal = {Alzheimer's \& dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.70988},
  pmid    = {41399037},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70988}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 46/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 26 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 46 of 100. Total 46 of 100.26 of the 56 points we could judge = 46 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multicenter collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 46 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41399037)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 26 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 46 out of 100.
Total 46 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Brain tissue and pathology

Also tagged “amyloid-angiopathy”

228 studies in the library carry the topic tag “amyloid-angiopathy”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 228 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Brain tissue and pathology

See all studies in Brain tissue and pathology →