Home › Research › Treatments
Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial on the efficacy and tolerability of a physostigmine patch in patients with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type
Möller H-J, Hampel H, Hegerl U, Schmitt W, Walter K.. Pharmacopsychiatry, 1999-05-01
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Owing to the pharmacokinetic properties of physostigmine when administered by conventional routes, long-term cholinergic treatment of Alzheimer's disease is difficult to manage. In order to overcome the problems associated with the oral and intravenous application of physostigmine, and to improve patients' compliance, a transdermal therapeutic system was developed. The efficacy and tolerability of this system were evaluated in a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study comparing patches containing 30 mg and 60 mg physostigmine with a placebo patch. The clinical trial followed the basic principles of the various guidelines on the evaluation of anti-dementia drugs, and included patients with mild to moderate probable Alzheimer's disease. A total of 204 patients with probable Alzheimer's disease were included in the study. Of these, 136 patients were eligible for the according-to-protocol analysis of efficacy, 167 subjects for the intention-to-treat analysis of efficacy, and 181 patients were included in the safety analysis. In contrast to the hypothesis to be tested, the efficacy of physostigmine was not superior to that of placebo after a treatment period of 24 weeks. On the contrary, there was even a slight, but not statistically significant, trend toward a better outcome in the placebo group. Median physostigmine plasma concentrations of approximately 100 pg/ml were measured, showing a high degree of interindividual variability and no linear dose relationship between the 30 mg and 60 mg dosages. Plasma cholinesterase activity was not significantly affected by physostigmine. The physostigmine patch application in doses of 30 mg and 60 mg apparently did not lead to physostigmine plasma concentrations that were sufficient to compensate for cholinergic deficiencies in affected brain areas and produce clinical benefits. Both the drug and the transdermal system were generally well tolerated under the study conditions. Modifications of the patch system may perhaps make it possible to achieve higher physostigmine plasma concentrations, which seem to be required to induce the expected beneficial effects during long-term treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
Key findings
- In order to overcome the problems associated with the oral and intravenous application of physostigmine, and to improve patients' compliance, a transdermal therapeutic system was developed.
- On the contrary, there was even a slight, but not statistically significant, trend toward a better outcome in the placebo group.
- Plasma cholinesterase activity was not significantly affected by physostigmine.
Why it matters
In this trial of 204 patients with probable Alzheimer's disease, the physostigmine patch was not superior to placebo after 24 weeks of treatment. There was even a slight, not statistically significant, trend toward better outcomes in the placebo group, so this treatment did not show benefit.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Participants204
- Evidence strengthHigh
How this study scored 52/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 50 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 52 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Pharmacopsychiatry) |
| Journal's citation record | 1 / 4 | Pharmacopsychiatry: journal h-index 106 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 11 / 12 | A randomised controlled trial (from PubMed type “Randomized Controlled Trial”) |
| Strength of evidence | 5 / 5 | Rated “high” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 1999 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 204 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 2 / 2 | Randomised and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record) |
| Times cited | 3 / 7 | Cited 25 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 0 / 5 | 0.9 citations a year over 29 year(s) since 1999 |
| Impact for its field and year | 1 / 6 | Cited 0.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 1 / 6 | Cited by 1 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Kate EL Walter holds only 5 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | 1 / 3 | Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München: institution h-index 1,224 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 0 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete) |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 10463377) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 50 / 96 | Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 50 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 52 out of 100. |
| Total | 52 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
May need a subscription Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 10 Oct 2026), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Möller, H. J., Hampel, H., Hegerl, U., Schmitt, W., & Walter, K. (1999). Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial on the efficacy and tolerability of a physostigmine patch in patients with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Pharmacopsychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-979202
Vancouver
Möller HJ, Hampel H, Hegerl U, Schmitt W, Walter K. Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial on the efficacy and tolerability of a physostigmine patch in patients with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1999. doi:10.1055/s-2007-979202. PMID: 10463377.
BibTeX
@article{moller1999-10463377,
author = {Möller, H. J. and Hampel, H. and Hegerl, U. and Schmitt, W. and Walter, K.},
title = {{Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial on the efficacy and tolerability of a physostigmine patch in patients with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type}},
journal = {Pharmacopsychiatry},
year = {1999},
doi = {10.1055/s-2007-979202},
pmid = {10463377},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-979202}
}
Later studies that cite this one
1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.