Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 44 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Lecanemab, an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody, has been approved for treatment of early Alzheimer's disease. However, real-world data remain limited regarding use. Using data from a large national health plan with primarily Medicare Advantage enrollees, we characterized demographic and clinical characteristics in the 6 months preceding the initial infusion among individuals who initiated lecanemab between 1/1/2023 and 06/30/2024. We also characterized the patterns of infusions and the timing of MRIs for safety monitoring following the initial infusion among initiators who had ≥ 3 months of follow-up. We further assessed trends in lecanemab use between 1/1/2023 and 12/31/2024. Of the 195 lecanemab initiators, the average age was 74.6 (SD = 5.5) years, 62.1% were female, 87.7% were White, 4.1% were Black, 1.5% were Hispanic, and 98.5% were on a Medicare Advantage plan. Almost all initiators resided in nonrural areas (96.4%); 2.6% used anticoagulants, and 1.5% used antiplatelets. Among the 119 initiators who had ≥ 3 months of follow-up, 40 (33.6%) received 7 total infusions, the expected number of infusions based on the recommended schedule of every 2 weeks. From the initial infusion, the average number of days to the first MRI was 47.1 (SD = 15.8), and to the second MRI scan was 73.4 (SD = 12.0) days, consistent with the recommended schedule. During 2023-2024, there were 526 patients who had ever received lecanemab. The increase in new initiators was modest over 2024, with only 43 more initiators during the final (n = 137) versus the first quarter (n = 94) of 2024. This study demonstrated slow uptake of lecanemab among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Adherence to the ideal treatment schedule was less than recommended. Early lecanemab users were not representative of the population likely eligible for treatment nationally. Further research is warranted to track longer-term trends in utilization, as well as reasons for treatment interruption or discontinuation in real-world populations.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study characterized real-world use of lecanemab among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries and found slow uptake, with only 43 more new initiators in the final versus first quarter of 2024. It describes treatment use patterns and safety monitoring, not whether lecanemab cures or prevents Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 44/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 44 of 100.44 of 100 points earned56 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of the American Geriatrics Society)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society: journal h-index 344 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 137 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-17)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Jerry H. Gurwitz: h-index 95 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Harvard University: institution h-index 3,236 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41139687)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 44 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Xiaojuan, L., Sonal, S., Andrea, D., & Gurwitz Jerry, H. (2025). Lecanemab Therapy Use Patterns for Alzheimer's Disease Among Early Initiators in a Large National Health Plan. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70010

Vancouver

Xiaojuan L, Sonal S, Andrea D, Gurwitz Jerry H. Lecanemab Therapy Use Patterns for Alzheimer's Disease Among Early Initiators in a Large National Health Plan. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2025. doi:10.1111/jgs.70010. PMID: 41139687.

BibTeX

@article{xiaojuan2025-41139687,
  author  = {Xiaojuan, Li and Sonal, Singh and Andrea, DeVries and Gurwitz Jerry, H.},
  title   = {{Lecanemab Therapy Use Patterns for Alzheimer's Disease Among Early Initiators in a Large National Health Plan}},
  journal = {Journal of the American Geriatrics Society},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1111/jgs.70010},
  pmid    = {41139687},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70010}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also tagged “double-blind”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “double-blind”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →