Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Genetics and APOE

Untargeted mass spectrometry remains underutilised for blood-based biomarker discovery in dementia research from large cohorts, where affinity-based approaches dominate. To address this, we examined mass-spectrometry–derived proteomic correlates of cognitive function, genetic predisposition to cognitive health, APOE ε4 status, and incident dementia. Using multivariate Bayesian regression, we assessed associations between 439 independent mass spectrometry signals and five cognitive outcomes—four cognitive tests and a cognitive function polygenic score—in Generation Scotland (n = 14,258). We observed associations between three cognitive tests (digit symbol, vocabulary and verbal fluency) and a mass spectrometry signal that mapped to selenoprotein P (absolute β range = 0.02 – 0.03, posterior inclusion probability ≥ 0.95). Carrying one or two copies of the APOE ε4 allele was associated with a lower mass spectrometry signal that mapped to afamin (β = -0.08 and -0.2, respectively, p < 3.1 x 10 -4 , n = 14,745). A higher mass spectrometry signal that maps to both complement c2 and complement factor B proteins was associated with lower hazard for incident dementia (hazard ratio = 0.75, p < 3.1 x 10 -4 , n cases = 212 and n controls = 6,765) diagnosed up to 17 years after blood sampling. We identified specific independent mass spectrometry signals which may be candidate biomarkers of cognitive function, APOE ε4 status, and could aid in the early detection of dementia; however, further replication studies in other populations are required.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 22 of the 62 points it could be judged on, which is 35 of 100. Raw total 35 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 35 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 35 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 35 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (medRxiv)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 14,258 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 22 / 62 Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 35 out of 100.
Total 35 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Smith, H. M., Moodie, J. E., Davies, G., Richmond, A., Robertson, J. A., Chybowska, A. D., et al. (2026). Proteomic biomarkers of cognitive function, APOE ε4 status, and dementia in Generation Scotland. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.26344912

Vancouver

Smith HM, Moodie JE, Davies G, Richmond A, Robertson JA, Chybowska AD, et al. Proteomic biomarkers of cognitive function, APOE ε4 status, and dementia in Generation Scotland. medRxiv. 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.01.27.26344912.

BibTeX

@article{smith2026-2d2f572b,
  author  = {Smith, H. M. and Moodie, J. E. and Davies, G. and Richmond, A. and Robertson, J. A. and Chybowska, A. D. and Drake, C. and Adkin, P. and others},
  title   = {{Proteomic biomarkers of cognitive function, APOE ε4 status, and dementia in Generation Scotland}},
  journal = {medRxiv},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.64898/2026.01.27.26344912},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.27.26344912}
}

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “genetics”

346 studies in the library carry the topic tag “genetics”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 346 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →