Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 65 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background Sarcopenia shares risk factors with various other age-related diseases. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of sarcopenia as a comorbid disease. Methods Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for articles from inception to 8th June 2018, reporting the prevalence of sarcopenia in individuals with a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD), dementia, diabetes mellitus or respiratory disease and, if applicable their controls. No exclusion criteria were applied with regards to definition of sarcopenia, individuals' age, study design and setting. Meta-analyses were stratified by disease, definition of sarcopenia and continent. Results The 63 included articles described 17,206 diseased individuals (mean age: 65.3 ± 1.6 years, 49.9% females) and 22,375 non-diseased controls (mean age: 54.6 ± 16.2 years, 53.8% females). The prevalence of sarcopenia in individuals with CVD was 31.4% (95% CI: 22.4-42.1%), no controls were available. The prevalence of sarcopenia was 26.4% (95% CI: 13.6-44.8%) in individuals with dementia compared to 8.3% (95% CI: 2.8-21.9%) in their controls; 31.1% (95% CI: 19.8-45.2%) in individuals with diabetes mellitus compared to 16.2% (95% CI: 9.5-26.2%) in controls; and 26.8% (95% CI: 17.8-38.1%) in individuals with respiratory diseases compared to 13.3% (95% CI: 8.3-20.7%) in controls. Conclusions Sarcopenia is highly prevalent in individuals with CVD, dementia, diabetes mellitus and respiratory disease.

Key findings

Why it matters

This meta-analysis found that sarcopenia was more common in people with dementia (26.4%) than in controls (8.3%), and also more common in people with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and respiratory disease. It shows sarcopenia often occurs alongside these conditions but does not test any treatment to prevent or cure dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 65/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 65 of 100.65 of 100 points earned35 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a meta-analysis pooling many studies. Scored zero for sample size and studied in people because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Experimental gerontology)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Experimental Gerontology: journal h-index 195 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 12 / 12 A meta-analysis pooling many studies
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 336 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 42.0 citations a year over 8 year(s) since 2020
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 134 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Andrea Britta Maier: h-index 81 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 The University of Melbourne: institution h-index 1,342 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 31887347)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 65 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Pacifico, J., Geerlings, M. A. J., Reijnierse, E. M., Phassouliotis, C., Lim, W. K., & Maier, A. B. (2020). Prevalence of sarcopenia as a comorbid disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Experimental gerontology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2019.110801

Vancouver

Pacifico J, Geerlings MAJ, Reijnierse EM, Phassouliotis C, Lim WK, Maier AB. Prevalence of sarcopenia as a comorbid disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Experimental gerontology. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2019.110801. PMID: 31887347.

BibTeX

@article{pacifico2020-31887347,
  author  = {Pacifico, J. and Geerlings, M. A. J. and Reijnierse, E. M. and Phassouliotis, C. and Lim, W. K. and Maier, A. B.},
  title   = {{Prevalence of sarcopenia as a comorbid disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis}},
  journal = {Experimental gerontology},
  year    = {2020},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.exger.2019.110801},
  pmid    = {31887347},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2019.110801}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Risk factors

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →