Home › Research › Digital health tools
Potential value and impact of data mining and machine learning in clinical diagnostics
Saberi-Karimian M, Khorasanchi Z, Ghazizadeh H, Tayefi M, Saffar S, Ferns GA, Ghayour-Mobarhan M.. Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences, 2021-03-19
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Data mining involves the use of mathematical sciences, statistics, artificial intelligence, and machine learning to determine the relationships between variables from a large sample of data. It has previously been shown that data mining can improve the prediction and diagnostic precision of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A few studies have applied machine learning to assess hypertension and metabolic syndrome-related biomarkers, as well as refine the assessment of cardiovascular disease risk. Machine learning methods have also been applied to assess new biomarkers and survival outcomes in patients with renal diseases to predict the development of chronic kidney disease, disease progression, and renal graft survival. In the latter, random forest methods were found to be the best for the prediction of chronic kidney disease. Some studies have investigated the prognosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and acute liver failure, as well as therapy response prediction in patients with viral disorders, using decision tree models. Machine learning techniques, such as Sparse High-Order Interaction Model with Rejection Option, have been used for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease. Data mining techniques have also been applied to identify the risk factors for serious mental illness, such as depression and dementia, and help to diagnose and predict the quality of life of such patients. In relation to child health, some studies have determined the best algorithms for predicting obesity and malnutrition. Machine learning has determined the important risk factors for preterm birth and low birth weight. Published studies of patients with cancer and bacterial diseases are limited and should perhaps be addressed more comprehensively in future studies. Herein, we provide an in-depth review of studies in which biochemical biomarker data were analyzed using machine learning methods to assess the risk of several common diseases, in order to summarize the potential applications of data mining methods in clinical diagnosis. Data mining techniques have now been increasingly applied to clinical diagnostics, and they have the potential to support this field.
Key findings
- It has previously been shown that data mining can improve the prediction and diagnostic precision of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Why it matters
This review describes how data mining and machine learning have been applied to diagnosis and prediction across several diseases, including mention of Alzheimer's disease. It is a general overview of diagnostic methods and does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Digital health →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 42/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences) |
| Journal's citation record | 1 / 4 | Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences: journal h-index 117 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 5 / 7 | Cited 104 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 3 / 5 | 14.9 citations a year over 7 year(s) since 2021 |
| Impact for its field and year | 3 / 6 | Cited 3.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 3 / 4 | Cited 60 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 3 / 4 | Last-listed author Majid Ghayour‐Mobarhan: h-index 63 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 0 / 3 | University Hospital of North Norway: institution h-index 296 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 1 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 3 countries |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 33739235) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Total | 42 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Saberi-Karimian, M., Khorasanchi, Z., Ghazizadeh, H., Tayefi, M., Saffar, S., Ferns, G. A., et al. (2021). Potential value and impact of data mining and machine learning in clinical diagnostics. Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2020.1857681
Vancouver
Saberi-Karimian M, Khorasanchi Z, Ghazizadeh H, Tayefi M, Saffar S, Ferns GA, et al. Potential value and impact of data mining and machine learning in clinical diagnostics. Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences. 2021. doi:10.1080/10408363.2020.1857681. PMID: 33739235.
BibTeX
@article{saberikarimian2021-33739235,
author = {Saberi-Karimian, M. and Khorasanchi, Z. and Ghazizadeh, H. and Tayefi, M. and Saffar, S. and Ferns, G. A. and Ghayour-Mobarhan, M.},
title = {{Potential value and impact of data mining and machine learning in clinical diagnostics}},
journal = {Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences},
year = {2021},
doi = {10.1080/10408363.2020.1857681},
pmid = {33739235},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2020.1857681}
}
Related studies in Digital health tools
Also in Digital health tools
178 studies in the library are filed under Digital health tools with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Digital health tools hub.