Home › Research › Digital health tools
Machine Learning-Based Alzheimer’s Disease Stage Diagnosis Utilizing Blood Gene Expression and Clinical Data: A Comparative Investigation
Manash Sarma, Subarna Chatterjee. Diagnostics, 2025-01-17
Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis
Utilizing clinical data, the highest ROC AUC scores attained were 0.989, 0.927, and 0.907 for the identification of the CN, MCI, and dementia stages, respectively. The highest F1 scores achieved were 0.971, 0.939, and 0.886. Employing gene expression data, we obtained ROC AUC scores of 0.763, 0.761, and 0.706 for the CN, MCI, and dementia stages, respectively, and F1 scores of 0.71, 0.77, and 0.53 for CN, MCI, and dementia, respectively. This represents the best outcome to date for AD stage diagnosis from ADNI blood gene expression profile data utilizing multiclassification techniques. The results indicated that our multiclassification model effectively manages the imbalanced data of a high-dimension, low-sample-size (HDLSS) nature to identify samples of the minority class. MAPK14, PLG, FZD2, FXYD6, and TEP1 are among the novel genes identified as being associated with AD risk.
Key findings
- Utilizing clinical data, the highest ROC AUC scores attained were 0.989, 0.927, and 0.907 for the identification of the CN, MCI, and dementia stages, respectively.
- The highest F1 scores achieved were 0.971, 0.939, and 0.886.
- Employing gene expression data, we obtained ROC AUC scores of 0.763, 0.761, and 0.706 for the CN, MCI, and dementia stages, respectively, and F1 scores of 0.71, 0.77, and 0.53 for CN, MCI, and dementia, respectively.
- This represents the best outcome to date for AD stage diagnosis from ADNI blood gene expression profile data utilizing multiclassification techniques.
- The results indicated that our multiclassification model effectively manages the imbalanced data of a high-dimension, low-sample-size (HDLSS) nature to identify samples of the minority class.
Why it matters
This study uses machine learning on blood gene expression and clinical data to identify Alzheimer's disease stages and flags several genes as associated with AD risk. It is a diagnostic and risk-association study only and does not test any treatment, cure or prevention.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Digital health →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Diagnostics) |
| Journal's citation record | 1 / 4 | Diagnostics: journal h-index 129 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 2 / 7 | Cited 10 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 2 / 5 | 3.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025 |
| Impact for its field and year | 3 / 6 | Cited 6.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 1 / 4 | Cited 10 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 1 / 4 | Last-listed author Subarna Chatterjee: h-index 13 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 0 / 3 | M S Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences: institution h-index 82 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 0 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete) |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39857095) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Sarma, M., & Chatterjee, S. (2025). Machine Learning-Based Alzheimer’s Disease Stage Diagnosis Utilizing Blood Gene Expression and Clinical Data: A Comparative Investigation. Diagnostics. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020211
Vancouver
Sarma M, Chatterjee S. Machine Learning-Based Alzheimer’s Disease Stage Diagnosis Utilizing Blood Gene Expression and Clinical Data: A Comparative Investigation. Diagnostics. 2025. doi:10.3390/diagnostics15020211. PMID: 39857095.
BibTeX
@article{sarma2025-39857095,
author = {Sarma, Manash and Chatterjee, Subarna},
title = {{Machine Learning-Based Alzheimer’s Disease Stage Diagnosis Utilizing Blood Gene Expression and Clinical Data: A Comparative Investigation}},
journal = {Diagnostics},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.3390/diagnostics15020211},
pmid = {39857095},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020211}
}
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Related studies in Digital health tools
Also tagged “classification”
835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.