Home › Research › Treatments
[Polypharmacy in patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms]
Schnieder M, von Arnim CAF.. Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026-01-14
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Dementia, delirium, and depression are the main geriatric psychiatric syndromes, and their prevalence is increasing significantly due to demographic aging. At the same time, multimorbidity and polypharmacy lead to increased interaction rates and a higher frequency of side effects, as well as reduced adherence. In Germany, the number of dementia cases is projected to rise from the current 1.8 million to 2.8 million by 2050. The most common etiologies are Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. Progressive cognitive and motor function loss often results in apraxia and dysphagia, which complicate pharmacotherapy. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) and memantine are used therapeutically. Newly approved amyloid antibodies (lecanemab, donanemab) show efficacy in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease, but carry the risk of amyloid-associated imaging abnormalities (ARIA). Dementia is considered a predisposing risk factor for delirium, which is characterized by fluctuations in attention and consciousness. Delirogenic factors include polypharmacy as well as other medications such as opioids and benzodiazepines. Due to the increased risk of mortality and stroke, neuroleptics should only be administered to geriatric patients when strictly indicated, in minimal doses, and for a limited duration. Non-pharmacological interventions take precedence. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are considered the first-line treatment for depressive disorders in older adults, while tricyclic antidepressants should be avoided. Regular medication reviews, reduction of anticholinergic burden, and technical aids to facilitate medication intake are essential for optimizing treatment adherence.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Schnieder, M., & von Arnim, C. A. F. (2026). [Polypharmacy in patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms]. Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-025-02049-2
Vancouver
Schnieder M, von Arnim CAF. [Polypharmacy in patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms]. Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany). 2026. doi:10.1007/s00108-025-02049-2. PMID: 41535445.
BibTeX
@article{schnieder2026-41535445,
author = {Schnieder, M. and von Arnim, C. A. F.},
title = {{[Polypharmacy in patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms]}},
journal = {Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.1007/s00108-025-02049-2},
pmid = {41535445},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-025-02049-2}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Dementia, delirium, and depression are the main geriatric psychiatric syndromes, and their prevalence is increasing significantly due to demographic aging.
- Progressive cognitive and motor function loss often results in apraxia and dysphagia, which complicate pharmacotherapy.
- Due to the increased risk of mortality and stroke, neuroleptics should only be administered to geriatric patients when strictly indicated, in minimal doses, and for a limited duration.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 43/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 25 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 43 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 5 / 5 | 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41535445) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 25 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 25 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 43 out of 100. |
| Total | 43 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Treatments
Also tagged “neuropsychiatric-symptoms”
5 studies in the library carry the topic tag “neuropsychiatric-symptoms”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 5 tagged studies.