Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100. End-of-life care

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Plain-language summary

Understanding dementia beliefs among Vietnamese people is crucial for the development of evidence-based interventions to promote positive help-seeking behaviors when facing the risk of dementia for themselves and their relatives. This study aims to examine the perceived dementia threats to oneself and relatives, and the perceived importance of advance dementia care planning among adults in the Central region of Vietnam, as well as their associated factors. A total of 300 adults, aged from 18 to 59 years, agreed to participate in the study. They were interviewed using a printed questionnaire at home. Results show that the perceived dementia threat to themselves was associated with their employment status, anxiety about aging, knowing someone with dementia, and dementia knowledge. On the other hand, religiosity, income, and worrying about getting dementia in the future significantly contributed to the perceived threat of dementia to their relatives. The perceived importance of advance care planning for dementia was significantly predicted by age, religiosity, dementia knowledge, and perceived threat of dementia to themselves. Received: 28th July, 2025; Revised: 2nd October, 2025; Accepted: 10th April, 2026

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Trang, N. T., Minh, B. T., Hang, D. T., Linh, D. P., & Lan, L. T. (2026). Perceptions of Dementia Threats and Related Advance Care Planning among Adults in Central Vietnam. VNU Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.33100/jossh.2026.2.1.9

Vancouver

Trang NT, Minh BT, Hang DT, Linh DP, Lan LT. Perceptions of Dementia Threats and Related Advance Care Planning among Adults in Central Vietnam. VNU Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2026. doi:10.33100/jossh.2026.2.1.9.

BibTeX

@article{trang2026-c4f32720,
  author  = {Trang, Nguyen Thu and Minh, Bui Thanh and Hang, Dao Thuy and Linh, Dinh Phuong and Lan, Le Thi},
  title   = {{Perceptions of Dementia Threats and Related Advance Care Planning among Adults in Central Vietnam}},
  journal = {VNU Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.33100/jossh.2026.2.1.9},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.33100/jossh.2026.2.1.9}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this survey of 300 adults in Central Vietnam, perceived dementia threat to oneself was linked to employment status, anxiety about aging, knowing someone with dementia, and dementia knowledge. The perceived importance of advance care planning for dementia was predicted by age, religiosity, dementia knowledge, and perceived threat of dementia to oneself.

Study details

How this study scored 31/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 30 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 31 of 100. Total 31 of 100.30 of the 96 points we could judge = 31 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 30 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 31 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (VNU Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 VNU Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities: journal h-index 0 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 300 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Le Thi Lan holds only 1 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Vietnam National University, Hanoi: institution h-index 166 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 30 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 30 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 31 out of 100.
Total 31 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in End-of-life care from nearby years

Also tagged “nursing”

995 studies in the library carry the topic tag “nursing”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 995 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on End-of-life care

See all studies in End-of-life care →