Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 34 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Clinical and population-based epidemiological studies report variation in the observed prevalence and incidence of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Although validated diagnostic criteria and clinical biomarkers support detection of DLB in clinical populations, it is estimated that only around one in three cases of DLB might be correctly identified in routine care. However, clear evidence that this is the case is lacking, and whether variability between studies reflects true geographical variation, or diagnostic differences, is unknown. We screened consecutive clinical case records of patients with dementia seen at nine memory clinics and dementia services, located across two distinct geographical areas, over an 18-month period. DLB cases identified during this process were approached for detailed retrospective case note review. Non-DLB controls, identified as the next consecutive patient diagnosed with a non-DLB dementia, matched for age, gender and Mini-Mental State Examination score, were also recruited. Diagnostic pathway, symptom profiles and all visits and treatments were recorded for DLB cases and non-DLB controls. Case notes of 9 410 individual patients, of whom 52.4% had a diagnosis of dementia, were reviewed. Patients with DLB made up 4.2% (95% CI 3.7–4.8%) of all dementia cases. Significant variation was observed between services, with DLB prevalence ranging from 1.8% to 5.9% (χ=24.3, p<0.01). DLB was significantly more prevalent in men (χ=20.45, p<0.01) and was negatively correlated with age (χ=8.2, p<0.01). DLB diagnostic rates in secondary care were considerably lower than would be expected based on previous neuropathological studies. Importantly, there was significant variation noted across services and regions. This variation, combined with the frequent diagnostic revision for DLB, suggests suboptimal recognition of core and suggestive features of the disease in some services, though the possibility of real differences in DLB prevalence cannot be entirely excluded.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Kane, J. P. M., Surendranathan, A., Barker, S. H., Bentley, A., Allan, L. M., Taylor, J., et al. (2017). [P2–526]: GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATIONS IN DIAGNOSTIC RATES FOR DEMENTIA WITH LEWY BODIES IN CLINICAL SERVICES. Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.1184

Vancouver

Kane JPM, Surendranathan A, Barker SH, Bentley A, Allan LM, Taylor J, et al. [P2–526]: GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATIONS IN DIAGNOSTIC RATES FOR DEMENTIA WITH LEWY BODIES IN CLINICAL SERVICES. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.1184.

BibTeX

@article{kane2017-f15b63ca,
  author  = {Kane, Joseph P. M. and Surendranathan, Ajenthan and Barker, Sally H. and Bentley, Alison and Allan, Louise M. and Taylor, John‐Paul and James, Peter W and Burn, David John and others},
  title   = {{[P2–526]: GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATIONS IN DIAGNOSTIC RATES FOR DEMENTIA WITH LEWY BODIES IN CLINICAL SERVICES}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
  year    = {2017},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.1184},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.1184}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that the proportion of dementia cases diagnosed as dementia with Lewy bodies varied significantly between memory clinics and regions. It does not test any treatment, cure or prevention, and the authors note it is unclear whether this variation reflects true differences or differences in diagnosis.

Study details

How this study scored 34/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 34 of 100.34 of 100 points earned66 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2017 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 11 year(s) since 2017
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author John Tiernan O'Brien: h-index 140 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Cambridge: institution h-index 1,973 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 34 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “bodies”

1,017 studies in the library carry the topic tag “bodies”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,017 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →