Home › Research › Long-term cohort studies
Obesity and Alzheimer's disease, does the obesity paradox really exist? A magnetic resonance imaging study
Pegueroles J, Jiménez A, Vilaplana E, Montal V, Carmona-Iragui M, Pané A, Alcolea D, Videla L et al.. Oncotarget, 2018-10-05
Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis
Plain-language summary
Mid-life obesity is an established risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, whereas late-life obesity has been proposed as a protective state. Weight loss, which predates cognitive decline, might explain this obesity paradox on AD risk. We aimed to assess the impact of late life obesity on brain structure taking into account weight loss as a potential confounder.
What this study adds
Evidence grade: Low
The record lists 162 participants. This study assessed the impact of late-life obesity on brain structure in 162 elderly controls from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, taking into account weight loss as a potential confounder. The authors aimed to see if the proposed protective effect of late-life obesity on Alzheimer's disease risk could be explained by weight loss before cognitive decline.
Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Pegueroles, J., Jiménez, A., Vilaplana, E., Montal, V., Carmona-Iragui, M., Pané, A., et al. (2018). Obesity and Alzheimer's disease, does the obesity paradox really exist? A magnetic resonance imaging study. Oncotarget. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26162
Vancouver
Pegueroles J, Jiménez A, Vilaplana E, Montal V, Carmona-Iragui M, Pané A, et al. Obesity and Alzheimer's disease, does the obesity paradox really exist? A magnetic resonance imaging study. Oncotarget. 2018. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.26162. PMID: 30410669.
BibTeX
@article{pegueroles2018-30410669,
author = {Pegueroles, J. and Jiménez, A. and Vilaplana, E. and Montal, V. and Carmona-Iragui, M. and Pané, A. and Alcolea, D. and Videla, L. and others},
title = {{Obesity and Alzheimer's disease, does the obesity paradox really exist? A magnetic resonance imaging study}},
journal = {Oncotarget},
year = {2018},
doi = {10.18632/oncotarget.26162},
pmid = {30410669},
url = {https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26162}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Weight loss, which predates cognitive decline, might explain this obesity paradox on AD risk.
- We aimed to assess the impact of late life obesity on brain structure taking into account weight loss as a potential confounder.
- We included 162 elderly controls of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) with available 3T MRI scan.
- Significant weight loss was defined as relative weight loss ≥5% between the baseline and last follow-up visit.
Why it matters
This study assessed the impact of late-life obesity on brain structure in 162 elderly controls from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, taking into account weight loss as a potential confounder. The authors aimed to see if the proposed protective effect of late-life obesity on Alzheimer's disease risk could be explained by weight loss before cognitive decline.
Study details
- Participants162
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 50/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Oncotarget) |
| Journal's citation record | 2 / 4 | Oncotarget: journal h-index 222 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2018 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 162 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 4 / 7 | Cited 92 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 3 / 5 | 9.2 citations a year over 10 year(s) since 2018 |
| Impact for its field and year | 3 / 6 | Cited 5.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 1 / 6 | Cited by 2 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 2 / 4 | Cited 34 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 3 / 4 | Last-listed author Juan Fortea: h-index 72 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 1 / 3 | Hospital Clínic de Barcelona: institution h-index 827 (OpenAlex) |
| Multicenter collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 8 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 30410669) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 50 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Later studies that cite this one
2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.
Related studies in Long-term cohort studies from nearby years
Also in Long-term cohort studies
54 studies in the library are filed under Long-term cohort studies with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Long-term cohort studies hub.