Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 59 out of 100. Long-term cohort studies

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Amyloid deposition and neurofibrillary degeneration in Alzheimer's disease specifically affect discrete neuronal systems, but the underlying mechanisms that render some brain regions more vulnerable to Alzheimer's disease pathology than others remain largely unknown. Here we studied molecular properties underlying these distinct regional vulnerabilities by analysing Alzheimer's disease-typical neuroimaging patterns of amyloid deposition and neurodegeneration in relation to regional gene expression profiles of the human brain. Graded patterns of brain-wide vulnerability to amyloid deposition and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease were estimated by contrasting multimodal amyloid-sensitive PET and structural MRI data between patients with Alzheimer's disease dementia (n = 76) and healthy controls (n = 126) enrolled in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Grothe, M. J., Sepulcre, J., Gonzalez-Escamilla, G., Jelistratova, I., Schöll, M., Hansson, O., et al. (2018). Molecular properties underlying regional vulnerability to Alzheimer's disease pathology. Brain : a journal of neurology. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy189

Vancouver

Grothe MJ, Sepulcre J, Gonzalez-Escamilla G, Jelistratova I, Schöll M, Hansson O, et al. Molecular properties underlying regional vulnerability to Alzheimer's disease pathology. Brain : a journal of neurology. 2018. doi:10.1093/brain/awy189. PMID: 30016411.

BibTeX

@article{grothe2018-30016411,
  author  = {Grothe, M. J. and Sepulcre, J. and Gonzalez-Escamilla, G. and Jelistratova, I. and Schöll, M. and Hansson, O. and Teipel, S. J. and {Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative}},
  title   = {{Molecular properties underlying regional vulnerability to Alzheimer's disease pathology}},
  journal = {Brain : a journal of neurology},
  year    = {2018},
  doi     = {10.1093/brain/awy189},
  pmid    = {30016411},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awy189}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study compared brain imaging patterns of amyloid and neurodegeneration in people with Alzheimer's dementia against healthy controls, and related those patterns to gene expression in different brain regions. It is an analysis of existing human data that may help explain why some brain areas are more vulnerable, but it does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 59/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 57 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 59 of 100. Total 59 of 100.57 of the 96 points we could judge = 59 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 57 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 59 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Brain : a journal of neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Brain: journal h-index 503 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2018 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 76 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 143 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 14.3 citations a year over 10 year(s) since 2018
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 10.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 2 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 44 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Harvard University: institution h-index 3,235 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 12 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 30016411)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 57 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 57 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 59 out of 100.
Total 59 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 13.

Later studies that cite this one

2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Long-term cohort studies

Also in Long-term cohort studies

54 studies in the library are filed under Long-term cohort studies with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Long-term cohort studies hub.

Similar studies

More on Long-term cohort studies

See all studies in Long-term cohort studies →