Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 64 out of 100. Prevention and risk

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

No significant difference between the three groups in ADAS-Cog was found at the primary endpoint at 15 months (CPR vs health advice, β= -0·04 [95% CI -0·34 to 0·26]; RFM vs health advice, β= -0·14 [-0·44 to 0·15]; CPR vs RFM, β=0·10 [-0·19 to 0·40]) nor at the 6-month and 12-month follow-ups.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Xu, Z., Zhang, D., Yip, B. H., Lee, E. K., Poon, P. K., Peters, R., et al. (2025). Combined mind-body physical exercise, cognitive training, and nurse-led risk factor modification to enhance cognition among older adults with mild cognitive impairment in primary care: a three-arm randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Healthy Longevity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100706

Vancouver

Xu Z, Zhang D, Yip BH, Lee EK, Poon PK, Peters R, et al. Combined mind-body physical exercise, cognitive training, and nurse-led risk factor modification to enhance cognition among older adults with mild cognitive impairment in primary care: a three-arm randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Healthy Longevity. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100706. PMID: 40294622.

BibTeX

@article{xu2025-40294622,
  author  = {Xu, Z. and Zhang, D. and Yip, B. H. and Lee, E. K. and Poon, P. K. and Peters, R. and Yang, Z. and Lee, A. T. and Leung, M. K. and Wong, E. L. and others},
  title   = {{Combined mind-body physical exercise, cognitive training, and nurse-led risk factor modification to enhance cognition among older adults with mild cognitive impairment in primary care: a three-arm randomised controlled trial}},
  journal = {The Lancet Healthy Longevity},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100706},
  pmid    = {40294622},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100706}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This three-arm trial found no significant difference in cognition between combined mind-body exercise, cognitive training and risk factor modification, risk factor modification alone, and health advice at 15 months or at earlier follow-ups. The interventions tested did not clearly improve cognition in people with mild cognitive impairment.

Study details

Limitations

Single clinic in Hong Kong; active components delivered for only 3 months; open-label; participants on average had relatively mild impairment and were a self-selected group who applied to join.

How this study scored 64/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 63 of the 98 points it could be judged on, which is 64 of 100. Total 64 of 100.63 of the 98 points we could judge = 64 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 63 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 64 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (The Lancet Healthy Longevity)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 The Lancet Healthy Longevity: journal h-index 78 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “null-result” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 456 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 9 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 9 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Samuel Yeung Shan Wong: h-index 72 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 UNSW Sydney: institution h-index 1,101 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40294622)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 63 / 98 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 63 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 64 out of 100.
Total 64 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — Unpaywall lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Prevention and risk

Also tagged “cognitive-function”

1,118 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cognitive-function”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,118 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Prevention and risk

See all studies in Prevention and risk →