Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 36 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Abstract Community livability may be associated with lower dementia prevalence through access to healthcare professionals, for example. Given the high rates of dementia among older adults with a disproportionate impact on women, there is a need to understand how community livability may buffer against dementia and mitigate gender disparities. Yet, few studies have considered community livability as an exposure. Therefore, our exploratory study determined county-level associations between community livability and dementia prevalence by gender in South Carolina (SC). We retrieved county-level dementia prevalent cases in 2016 among ≥50 years old (N=46) from the SC Alzheimer’s Disease Registry. Community livability data (categorized into tertiles) were obtained from the American Association of Retired Persons’ Livability Index in 2018, which included seven domains: housing, neighborhood, transportation, physical environment, healthcare access, social engagement, and economic as well as educational opportunity. We conducted OLS regression analysis adjusting for county-level rurality to estimate beta coefficients and p-values. The study included 48.6% women (n=622) and 51.4% men (n=656). In adjusted analyses, low vs. high livability was associated with higher dementia prevalence (B=0.38; p-value=0.31). Although not statistically significant, the findings are in the expected direction. Low vs. high livability was associated with higher dementia among women (B=0.11; p-value=0.69), but lower dementia among men (B= -0.78; p-value=0.07). Our novel findings regarding communities with higher livability being associated with lower dementia highlight the potential health benefits of enhancing the livability of communities and is a first step towards future research to better understand this understudied relationship.

Key findings

Why it matters

This exploratory county-level study found that lower community livability was linked to higher dementia prevalence, but the result was not statistically significant. It is an early, exploratory analysis and does not test any treatment, cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 36/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 36 of 100.36 of 100 points earned64 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Innovation in Aging)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Innovation in Aging: journal h-index 48 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 46 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 4 year(s) since 2024
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Maggi C. Miller: h-index 6 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Michigan: institution h-index 2,240 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 36 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Alhasan, D. M., Wende, M. E., Antonucci, T. C., Dallo, F. J., & Miller, M. C. (2024). LOWER COMMUNITY LIVABILITY IS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHER DEMENTIA PREVALENCE AMONG WOMEN IN SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTIES. Innovation in Aging. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0046

Vancouver

Alhasan DM, Wende ME, Antonucci TC, Dallo FJ, Miller MC. LOWER COMMUNITY LIVABILITY IS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHER DEMENTIA PREVALENCE AMONG WOMEN IN SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTIES. Innovation in Aging. 2024. doi:10.1093/geroni/igae098.0046.

BibTeX

@article{alhasan2024-9912b3b7,
  author  = {Alhasan, Dana M. and Wende, Marilyn E. and Antonucci, Toni C. and Dallo, Florence J. and Miller, Maggi C.},
  title   = {{LOWER COMMUNITY LIVABILITY IS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHER DEMENTIA PREVALENCE AMONG WOMEN IN SOUTH CAROLINA COUNTIES}},
  journal = {Innovation in Aging},
  year    = {2024},
  doi     = {10.1093/geroni/igae098.0046},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae098.0046}
}

Related studies in Risk factors

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →