Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 54 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Objectives The causal relationship between slow gait speed and poor cognition is uncertain due to potential reverse causality. This study aimed to examine the reciprocal relationship between gait speed and global as well as domain-specific cognitive functions in older adults. Design Prospective cohort study (2013–2022) including 4 repeated measures. Settings and Participants Community-dwelling and adults without dementia aged ≥65 recruited at baseline. Methods Biennial evaluations included assessments of 4-m usual walking speed, global cognition using the Taiwanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and cognitive domains (memory, executive function, verbal fluency, and attention) using a battery of neuropsychological tests. Cross-lagged models and linear mixed models were used to examine the bidirectional association between gait speed and cognitive functions with adjustment for potential confounders. Results At baseline, 511 participants were enrolled, and 459 individuals with a mean age of 74.5 years were ultimately analyzed. A 1-SD decrease in gait speed was associated with a 0.07–0.09 SD decrease in subsequent global cognition [ β ˆ Wave 1→2 : 0.07, standard error (SE): 0.03; β ˆ Wave 2→3 : 0.09, SE: 0.04; β ˆ Wave 3→4 : 0.09, SE: 0.04; all P < .05]. Similarly, a 1-SD decrease in global cognition was associated with a 0.18 to 0.19 SD decrease in subsequent gait speed ( β ˆ Wave 1→2 : 0.18, SE: 0.05; β ˆ Wave 2→3 : 0.18, SE: 0.06; β ˆ Wave 3→4 : 0.19, SE: 0.07; all P < .001). In addition, slower gait speed was associated with poor memory, verbal fluency, and executive function, and vice versa. The results of linear mixed models were consistent with the findings obtained from cross-lagged models. Conclusions and Implications This study found a reciprocal association between gait speed and global or domain-specific cognition. Regularly screening gait speed and cognitive function enables the early detection of declines in physical function and cognition.

Key findings

Why it matters

In community-dwelling older adults without dementia, slower gait speed predicted later lower global cognition, and lower global cognition predicted later slower gait speed. This shows a bidirectional association over time but does not test any treatment, cure or prevention for Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 54/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 54 of 100.54 of 100 points earned46 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of the American Medical Directors Association)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Journal of the American Medical Directors Association: journal h-index 172 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 511 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 8 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 8 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Yen‐Ching Chen: h-index 33 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 National Taiwan University: institution h-index 752 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40086793)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 54 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Su, Y., Chiou, J., Shiu, C. A., Chen, J., & Chen, Y. (2025). Longitudinal, Bidirectional Association between Gait Speed and Cognitive Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults without Dementia. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105544

Vancouver

Su Y, Chiou J, Shiu CA, Chen J, Chen Y. Longitudinal, Bidirectional Association between Gait Speed and Cognitive Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults without Dementia. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105544. PMID: 40086793.

BibTeX

@article{su2025-40086793,
  author  = {Su, Ying‐Hao and Chiou, Jeng‐Min and Shiu, Chengshi Amory and Chen, Jen‐Hau and Chen, Yen‐Ching},
  title   = {{Longitudinal, Bidirectional Association between Gait Speed and Cognitive Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults without Dementia}},
  journal = {Journal of the American Medical Directors Association},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105544},
  pmid    = {40086793},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105544}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “cognitive-function”

1,118 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cognitive-function”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,118 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →