Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100. Cognitive tests and assessment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Objectives This study evaluated the effectiveness of group‑based digital reminiscence therapy (GDRT) delivered via large‑screen visual stimuli optimized for the perceptual characteristics of people with dementia. The primary aim was to reduce behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and caregiver burden.Methods A crossover study was conducted with 44 residents from four long‑term care facilities. Participants received five weeks of GDRT and five weeks of conventional activities in alternating sequences, separated by a 12‑week washout period. GDRT employed visually enhanced photographs and videos projected on a 100‑inch screen. Primary outcomes were BPSD and caregiver burden assessed using the NPI‑NH; secondary outcomes included cognitive function (MMSE‑J) and verbal fluency.Results Compared with conventional activities, GDRT resulted in significantly greater reductions in overall BPSD (r = 0.56, p = .001) and caregiver burden (r = 0.44, p = .011). Significant improvements were observed in apathy. Cognitive function improved during the GDRT phase (r = 0.44), whereas verbal fluency showed no significant change.Conclusions GDRT tailored to visual and cognitive characteristics of people with dementia effectively reduces apathy, BPSD and caregiver burden.Clinical implications Visually optimized, large‑screen digital reminiscence materials represent a practical and resource‑efficient approach for dementia care.

Key findings

Why it matters

In 44 nursing home residents, group digital reminiscence therapy on a large screen reduced behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia and caregiver burden, and improved apathy and cognitive function, compared with usual activities. This is a small crossover study of a non-drug activity, so it addresses symptom management rather than curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 32/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 32 of 100.32 of 100 points earned68 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Clinical Gerontologist)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Clinical Gerontologist: journal h-index 66 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Takashi Ishikawa: h-index 32 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Akita University: institution h-index 267 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42033242)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 32 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Asano, T., Izumi, K., & Ishikawa, T. (2026). Large-Screen Group Digital Reminiscence Therapy Reduces BPSD in Dementia: Findings from a Crossover Comparative Study. Clinical Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2026.2664051

Vancouver

Asano T, Izumi K, Ishikawa T. Large-Screen Group Digital Reminiscence Therapy Reduces BPSD in Dementia: Findings from a Crossover Comparative Study. Clinical Gerontologist. 2026. doi:10.1080/07317115.2026.2664051. PMID: 42033242.

BibTeX

@article{asano2026-42033242,
  author  = {Asano, Tomoaki and Izumi, Kana and Ishikawa, Takashi},
  title   = {{Large-Screen Group Digital Reminiscence Therapy Reduces BPSD in Dementia: Findings from a Crossover Comparative Study}},
  journal = {Clinical Gerontologist},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1080/07317115.2026.2664051},
  pmid    = {42033242},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2026.2664051}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment

Also tagged “double-blind”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “double-blind”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Cognitive tests and assessment

See all studies in Cognitive tests and assessment →