Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

A valid quantitative imaging method for the measurement of amyloid deposition in humans could improve Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis and antiamyloid therapy assessment. Our group developed Pittsburgh Compound-B (PIB), an amyloid-binding radiotracer, for positron emission tomography (PET). The current study was aimed to further validate PIB PET through quantitative imaging (arterial input) and inclusion of subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Pittsburgh Compound-B studies were performed in five AD, five MCI, and five control subjects and five subjects were retested within 20 days. Magnetic resonance images were acquired for partial volume correction and region-of-interest definition (e.g., posterior cingulate: PCG; cerebellum: CER). Data were analyzed using compartmental and graphical approaches. Regional distribution volume (DV) values were normalized to the reference region (CER) to yield DV ratios (DVRs). Good agreement was observed between compartmental and Logan DVR values (e.g., PCG: r=0.89, slope=0.91); the Logan results were less variable. Nonspecific PIB retention was similar across subjects (n=15, Logan CER DV: 3.63+/-0.48). Greater retention was observed in AD cortical areas, relative to controls (P<0.05). The PIB retention in MCI subjects appeared either 'AD-like' or 'control-like'. The mean test/retest variation was approximately 6% in primary areas-of-interest. The Logan analysis was the method-of-choice for the PIB PET data as it proved stable, valid, and promising for future larger studies and voxel-based statistical analyses. This study also showed that it is feasible to perform quantitative PIB PET imaging studies that are needed to validate simpler methods for routine use across the AD disease spectrum.

Why it matters

Tested quantitative PET imaging with Pittsburgh Compound-B (PIB), an amyloid-binding tracer, in five people with Alzheimer's disease, five with mild cognitive impairment, and five controls. Retention was greater in Alzheimer's cortical areas than in controls, people with mild cognitive impairment looked either 'AD-like' or 'control-like', and the authors found the Logan analysis method stable and valid.

How this study scored 46/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence left out, no data; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 44 of the 95 points it could be judged on, which is 46 of 100. Total 46 of 100.44 of the 95 points we could judge = 46 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on strength of evidence, so that was left out: it earned 44 of the 95 points we could judge it on, which is 46 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism: journal h-index 285 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence — / 5 No evidence rating recorded — left out of this score
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2005 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 722 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 31.4 citations a year over 23 year(s) since 2005
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 19.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 38 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Chester A. Mathis: h-index 105 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Pittsburgh: institution h-index 1,470 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 15944649)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 44 / 95 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 44 of the 95 points we could judge it on is 46 out of 100.
Total 46 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 10 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Price, J. C., Klunk, W. E., Lopresti, B. J., Lu, X., Hoge, J. A., Ziolko, S. K., et al. (2005). Kinetic Modeling of Amyloid Binding in Humans using PET Imaging and Pittsburgh Compound-B. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600146

Vancouver

Price JC, Klunk WE, Lopresti BJ, Lu X, Hoge JA, Ziolko SK, et al. Kinetic Modeling of Amyloid Binding in Humans using PET Imaging and Pittsburgh Compound-B. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 2005. doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600146. PMID: 15944649.

BibTeX

@article{price2005-15944649,
  author  = {Price, Julie C. and Klunk, William E. and Lopresti, Brian J. and Lu, Xueling and Hoge, Jessica A. and Ziolko, Scott K. and Holt, Daniel P. and MELTZER, CAROLYN CIDIS and DeKosky, Steven T. and Mathis, Chester A.},
  title   = {{Kinetic Modeling of Amyloid Binding in Humans using PET Imaging and Pittsburgh Compound-B}},
  journal = {Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow \& Metabolism},
  year    = {2005},
  doi     = {10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600146},
  pmid    = {15944649},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600146}
}

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →