Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Genetics

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

INTRODUCTIONMultimodal lifestyle interventions can delay or slow Alzheimers disease (AD) in at-risk older adults, and plasma pTau217, a blood-based biomarker, now enables scalable AD risk stratification. Populationlevel screening integrating genetic, biomarker, and lifestyle risk factors, alongside attitudes toward risk disclosure, remains understudied. This pilot assessed dementia-risk attitudes before and after disclosure and tested a personalized, data-driven multimodal coaching intervention in a high-risk Alabama population. METHODSCognitively normal adults aged 65-75 with a first-degree relative affected by AD/dementia were recruited in north Alabama and screened using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, family history, APOE genotyping, non-APOE AD polygenic risk score, and plasma pTau217. A composite rubric classified high-risk status (score >5 and/or pTau217 >0.18 pg/mL); high-risk participants received results disclosure and a 6-month personalized intervention (dietitian-led coaching, cognitive training, activity tracking). Pre- and postdisclosure attitudes, distress (REVEAL IGT-AD scale), and biomarker/cognitive measures were assessed. RESULTSOf 138 screened participants, 52 (37.7%) were high-risk, most (69.2%) by pTau217 alone. Before disclosure, subjective dementia-risk perception correlated with objective risk score. Scores consistent with post-disclosure clinically significant distress occurred in 28% of survey respondents in at least one timepoint but was often (50%) observed with pre-existing anxiety/depression. Over 6 months, MoCA scores and lifestyle risk indices were unchanged, pTau217 continued rising but at a slowed rate compared to between screening and the beginning of the lifestyle intervention, and self-reported worry and perceived dementia risk decreased significantly. DISCUSSIONA genomics- and biomarker-informed screening and coaching model is feasible in a high-risk cohort in the deep south, with manageable distress and improved attitudes despite limited short-term biological change. Findings support larger, longer, and more diverse trials validating this approach for AD screening.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Cochran, M., Pugh, J., Coleman, T., Kelley, W., Jamieson, P., Dunne, E., et al. (2026). Clinical and attitudinal outcomes of a personalized, multimodal lifestyle intervention for Alzheimer's disease prevention in high-risk, cognitively normal older adults in north Alabama: A pilot study. medRxiv (preprint). https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.19.26363495

Vancouver

Cochran M, Pugh J, Coleman T, Kelley W, Jamieson P, Dunne E, et al. Clinical and attitudinal outcomes of a personalized, multimodal lifestyle intervention for Alzheimer's disease prevention in high-risk, cognitively normal older adults in north Alabama: A pilot study. medRxiv (preprint). 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.09.19.26363495.

BibTeX

@article{cochran2026-4286e09f,
  author  = {Cochran, M. and Pugh, J. and Coleman, T. and Kelley, W. and Jamieson, P. and Dunne, E. and Smith, P. and Chasteen and others},
  title   = {{Clinical and attitudinal outcomes of a personalized, multimodal lifestyle intervention for Alzheimer's disease prevention in high-risk, cognitively normal older adults in north Alabama: A pilot study}},
  journal = {medRxiv (preprint)},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.64898/2026.09.19.26363495},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.19.26363495}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This pilot study screened older adults for Alzheimer's risk using genetics and a blood biomarker, then gave high-risk participants a six-month lifestyle coaching program. It is a small pilot focused on feasibility and attitudes toward risk disclosure, and it does not show whether the intervention prevents Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 20 of the 90 points it could be judged on, which is 22 of 100. Raw total 22 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 22 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 22 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on impact for its field and year and senior author's track record, so those were left out: it earned 20 of the 90 points we could judge it on, which is 22 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (medRxiv (preprint))
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Jesse Nicholas Cochran holds only 1 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Buck Institute for Research on Aging: institution h-index 485 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 20 / 90 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 20 of the 90 points we could judge it on is 22 out of 100.
Total 22 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 14.

Related studies in Genetics

Also in Genetics

173 studies in the library are filed under Genetics with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Genetics hub.

Similar studies

More on Genetics

See all studies in Genetics →