Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 33 out of 100. End-of-life care

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Abstract Voluntary assisted dying (VAD) is an end-of-life care option available to eligible Australians living with a terminal condition, though people living with dementia are typically ineligible to choose VAD as part of their end-of-life care. In order to develop equitable research-informed policy and practice, it is crucial to include the perspectives of all key stakeholders, including living experience experts whose voices are currently excluded from Australian VAD research. This study aims to capture the perspectives of people living with dementia by exploring their VAD-related needs and preferences. The study is grounded in a critical and phenomenological conceptual framework that prioritizes inclusive research design. Thirty-six people living with dementia in Australia self-selected to participate in an online survey. It found that the vast majority of participants wanted the option to access VAD themselves, and most wanted provisions for accessing VAD through advance care directives. Through open text responses, the participants expressed many concerns about potential end-of-life suffering and loss of dignity, with their VAD preferences often aligned with their wish to maintain autonomy and human rights. This is the first known Australian study to explore VAD from the perspective of people living with dementia, providing critical insights into their experiences as stakeholders in a highly contested policy and practice environment that is dominated by medico-legal voices. Centring on people living with dementia challenges misconceptions about their capacity to contribute to VAD research, demonstrating their importance as living experience experts and key stakeholders with clear needs and preferences for their end-of-life care.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Matthys, A., Cash, B., & Moorhead, B. (2025). ‘It should be my choice’: voluntary assisted dying needs and preferences of Australians living with dementia. Ageing and Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x25100330

Vancouver

Matthys A, Cash B, Moorhead B. ‘It should be my choice’: voluntary assisted dying needs and preferences of Australians living with dementia. Ageing and Society. 2025. doi:10.1017/s0144686x25100330.

BibTeX

@article{matthys2025-456317c7,
  author  = {Matthys, Adrienne and Cash, Belinda and Moorhead, Bernadette},
  title   = {{‘It should be my choice’: voluntary assisted dying needs and preferences of Australians living with dementia}},
  journal = {Ageing and Society},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1017/s0144686x25100330},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x25100330}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this online survey, 36 Australians living with dementia mostly wanted the option to access voluntary assisted dying themselves and through advance care directives. It reports their end-of-life care preferences, not any treatment, cure or prevention of Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 33/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 33 of 100.33 of 100 points earned67 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Ageing and Society)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Ageing and Society: journal h-index 135 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Bernadette Moorhead: h-index 9 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Charles Sturt University: institution h-index 321 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 33 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in End-of-life care

Also tagged “care”

996 studies in the library carry the topic tag “care”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 996 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on End-of-life care

See all studies in End-of-life care →