Home › Research › End-of-life care
Shaping a knowable event or embracing a mysterious journey: A mixed methods study on palliative care clinician views on voluntary assisted dying
Graham Llewellyn Grove, Melanie R Lovell, Phyllis Noemi Butow, Ian Paul Hughes, Megan C Best. Palliative & Supportive Care, 2025-01-01
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Abstract Objectives This study explored Australian palliative care clinicians’ perspectives on the legalization of voluntary assisted dying (VAD), aiming to identify variables associated with clinicians’ views and understand challenges of its implementation. Methods An online survey exploring support for legalization of VAD was sent to palliative care clinicians in Queensland and New South Wales and followed up with semi-structured interviews. Support was categorized as positive, uncertain, or negative. An ordinal logistic regression model was used to identify variables independently predictive of euthanasia support. Interviews were analyzed using grounded theory to understand key concepts shaping views on VAD. Results Of 142 respondents, 53% supported, 10% were uncertain, and 37% opposed legalizing euthanasia for terminal illness with severe symptoms. Support was lower for patients with chronic illness (34%), severe disability (24%), depression (9%), severe dementia (5%), and for any adult with capacity (4%). The model showed lower support among doctors than nurses (38% vs. 69%, p = 0.0001), those in New South Wales compared with Queensland (44% vs. 69%, p = 0.0002), the highly religious versus least religious (24% vs. 79%, p = 0.00002), those politically conservative versus progressive (39% vs. 60%, p = 0.04), and those with more healthcare experience (p = 0.03). Seventeen interviews revealed 2 distinct groups: one focused on the event of death and the need to relieve suffering, providing comfort in the final moments; the second on the journey of dying and the possibility of discovering peace despite suffering. Those in the first group supported legal VAD, while those in the second opposed it. Despite opposing views, compassion was a unifying foundation common to both groups. Significance of results There are 2 fundamentally different orientations toward VAD among palliative care clinicians, which will likely contribute to tensions within teams. Acknowledging that both perspectives are rooted in compassion may provide a constructive basis for navigating disagreements and supporting team cohesion.
Key findings
- Abstract Objectives This study explored Australian palliative care clinicians’ perspectives on the legalization of voluntary assisted dying (VAD), aiming to identify variables associated with clinicians’ views and understand challenges of its implementation.
- Results Of 142 respondents, 53% supported, 10% were uncertain, and 37% opposed legalizing euthanasia for terminal illness with severe symptoms.
- The model showed lower support among doctors than nurses (38% vs. 69%, p = 0.0001), those in New South Wales compared with Queensland (44% vs. 69%, p = 0.0002), the highly religious versus least religious (24% vs. 79%, p = 0.00002), those politically conservative versus progressive (39% vs. 60%, p = 0.04), and those with more healthcare experience ( p = 0.03).
- Seventeen interviews revealed 2 distinct groups: one focused on the event of death and the need to relieve suffering, providing comfort in the final moments; the second on the journey of dying and the possibility of discovering peace despite suffering.
- Significance of results There are 2 fundamentally different orientations toward VAD among palliative care clinicians, which will likely contribute to tensions within teams.
Why it matters
This mixed methods study of Australian palliative care clinicians found support for legalizing voluntary assisted dying was lower for patients with severe dementia (5%) than for terminal illness with severe symptoms overall. It identified variables associated with clinicians' views and challenges of implementation.
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 35/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Palliative & Supportive Care) |
| Journal's citation record | 1 / 4 | Palliative & Supportive Care: journal h-index 85 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 1 / 7 | Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 0 / 5 | 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025 |
| Impact for its field and year | 2 / 6 | Cited 1.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 2 / 4 | Last-listed author Megan C Best: h-index 25 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 1 / 3 | The University of Sydney: institution h-index 1,466 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 2 countries |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40899252) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 35 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.1017/s1478951525100655
- PubMed: 40899252
- Original source →
- Free full text: Palliative & Supportive Care →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Grove, G. L., Lovell, M. R., Butow, P. N., Hughes, I. P., & Best, M. C. (2025). Shaping a knowable event or embracing a mysterious journey: A mixed methods study on palliative care clinician views on voluntary assisted dying. Palliative & Supportive Care. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478951525100655
Vancouver
Grove GL, Lovell MR, Butow PN, Hughes IP, Best MC. Shaping a knowable event or embracing a mysterious journey: A mixed methods study on palliative care clinician views on voluntary assisted dying. Palliative & Supportive Care. 2025. doi:10.1017/s1478951525100655. PMID: 40899252.
BibTeX
@article{grove2025-40899252,
author = {Grove, Graham Llewellyn and Lovell, Melanie R and Butow, Phyllis Noemi and Hughes, Ian Paul and Best, Megan C},
title = {{Shaping a knowable event or embracing a mysterious journey: A mixed methods study on palliative care clinician views on voluntary assisted dying}},
journal = {Palliative \& Supportive Care},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1017/s1478951525100655},
pmid = {40899252},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478951525100655}
}
Related studies in End-of-life care
Also tagged “care”
996 studies in the library carry the topic tag “care”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 996 tagged studies.