Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the gradual loss of neurons and the accumulation of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Despite advancements in the understanding of AD's pathophysiology, the cellular organization and interactions in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) remain elusive. Eight single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets from both normal controls and individuals with AD were harmonized. Stringent preprocessing protocols were implemented to uphold dataset integrity. Unsupervised clustering and annotation revealed 22 distinct cell clusters corresponding to 19 unique cell types. The spatial architecture of the PFC region was constructed using the CARD tool. Further analyses encompassed trajectory examination of Oligodendrocyte subtypes, evaluation of regulon activity scores, and spot clustering within white matter regions (WM). Differential expression analysis and functional enrichment assays unveiled molecular signatures linked to AD progression and were validated using microarray data sourced from neurodegenerative disorder patients. Our investigation employs scRNA-seq and spatial transcriptomics to uncover the cellular atlas and spatial architecture of the human PFC in AD. Moreover, our results indicate that Oligodendrocytes are more prevalent in AD patients, showcasing diverse subtypes and spatial organization within WM regions. Each subtype appears to be associated with distinct biological processes and transcriptional regulators, shedding light on their involvement in AD pathology. Notably, the Oligodendrocyte_C6 subtype is linked to neurological damage in AD patients, characterized by heightened expression of genes involved in cell-cell connections, cell membrane stability, and myelination. Additionally, 12 target genes regulated by NFIA were identified, which are upregulated in AD patients and associated with disease progression. Elevated PLXDC2 expression in peripheral blood was also identified, suggesting its potential as a non-invasive biomarker for early AD detection. Our study provides novel insights into the role of Oligodendrocytes in AD and highlights the potential of PLXDC2 as a blood biomarker for non-invasive diagnosis and monitoring of AD patients.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Fan, X., & Li, H. (2025). Integration of Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomic Data Reveals Spatial Architecture and Potential Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease. Molecular neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-024-04617-3

Vancouver

Fan X, Li H. Integration of Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomic Data Reveals Spatial Architecture and Potential Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease. Molecular neurobiology. 2025. doi:10.1007/s12035-024-04617-3. PMID: 39543008.

BibTeX

@article{fan2025-39543008,
  author  = {Fan, X. and Li, H.},
  title   = {{Integration of Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomic Data Reveals Spatial Architecture and Potential Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease}},
  journal = {Molecular neurobiology},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1007/s12035-024-04617-3},
  pmid    = {39543008},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-024-04617-3}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 24 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 41 of 100. Total 41 of 100.24 of the 58 points we could judge = 41 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 24 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 41 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Molecular neurobiology)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39543008)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 24 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 24 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 41 out of 100.
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “biomarkers”

13 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biomarkers”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 13 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →