Home › Research › Digital health tools
Imputation-Based Harmonization Mitigates Site Effects Without Data Leakage in Machine Learning Studies
Hillman N, Chen AA, Hu F, Vandekar SN, Melhem R, Beason-Held LL, Satterthwaite TD, Davatzikos C et al.. bioRxiv, 2026-10-05
Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment
Neuroimaging studies that pool data across clinical sites often suffer from site effects — variability in imaging measures that arises from technical heterogeneity across sites as opposed to true biological signal. While numerous harmonization methods have been proposed to remove site effects from imaging features, less attention has been placed on how to incorporate harmonization models into common machine-learning pipelines. We demonstrate that current approaches for integration either suffer from data leakage, fail to fully remove site effects from the target data, or attenuate true biological associations during the harmonization process. To address these issues, we propose Multiple Imputation for Removing Technical Heterogeneity (MIRTH), which uses imputed outcomes to harmonize the test data. We benchmark MIRTH’s performance using both simulated and real-world volumetric data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, demonstrating that MIRTH can achieve high predictive accuracy while avoiding inflated performance when the outcome is imbalanced across clinical sites.
Key findings
- Neuroimaging studies that pool data across clinical sites often suffer from site effects — variability in imaging measures that arises from technical heterogeneity across sites as opposed to true biological signal.
- While numerous harmonization methods have been proposed to remove site effects from imaging features, less attention has been placed on how to incorporate harmonization models into common machine-learning pipelines.
- We demonstrate that current approaches for integration either suffer from data leakage, fail to fully remove site effects from the target data, or attenuate true biological associations during the harmonization process.
- To address these issues, we propose Multiple Imputation for Removing Technical Heterogeneity (MIRTH), which uses imputed outcomes to harmonize the test data.
- We benchmark MIRTH’s performance using both simulated and real-world volumetric data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, demonstrating that MIRTH can achieve high predictive accuracy while avoiding inflated performance when the outcome is imbalanced across clinical sites.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Digital health →
Study details
- Study designlongitudinal study
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 16/100
Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 35 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 35 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 2 / 10 | Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (bioRxiv) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count |
| Study design | 7 / 12 | A longitudinal study following the same people over time |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 4 / 10 | Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server. |
| How recent | 5 / 5 | 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 22 / 62 | Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 35 out of 100. |
| Total | 35 / 100 | Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article. |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Hillman, N., Chen, A. A., Hu, F., Vandekar, S. N., Melhem, R., Beason-Held, L. L., et al. (2026). Imputation-Based Harmonization Mitigates Site Effects Without Data Leakage in Machine Learning Studies. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.28.755204
Vancouver
Hillman N, Chen AA, Hu F, Vandekar SN, Melhem R, Beason-Held LL, et al. Imputation-Based Harmonization Mitigates Site Effects Without Data Leakage in Machine Learning Studies. bioRxiv. 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.09.28.755204.
BibTeX
@article{hillman2026-35cc200a,
author = {Hillman, N. and Chen, A. A. and Hu, F. and Vandekar, S. N. and Melhem, R. and Beason-Held, L. L. and Satterthwaite, T. D. and Davatzikos, C. and others},
title = {{Imputation-Based Harmonization Mitigates Site Effects Without Data Leakage in Machine Learning Studies}},
journal = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.64898/2026.09.28.755204},
url = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.28.755204}
}