Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Long-term cohort studies

Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment

The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) provides a comprehensive multimodal neuroimaging resource for studying aging and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, its resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) data remain underutilized, in part due to challenges with data processing driven by considerable variability in acquisition protocols, inconsistent organization, missing or incomplete imaging sessions, and frequency of data quality issues due to participant motion and aging-related factors. To facilitate widespread use of ADNI rs-fMRI data, we developed an open-source pipeline encompassing the download and organization of imaging and clinical data, conversion to Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS), preprocessing with fMRIPrep, and automated quality control (QC). Our QC considers acquisition parameters and 16 structural and functional MRIQC image-quality metrics, flagging scans that fall outside acceptable ranges based on expert input and robust outlier detection techniques. Processed imaging sessions are matched to temporally aligned clinical assessments to produce an analysis-ready dataset. Applying the pipeline to more than 2,800 sessions from ADNI GO, ADNI 2, and ADNI 3 yielded 2,086 quality-checked functional and structural MRI sessions from 935 unique participants. Exclusions occurred at every processing stage and were driven primarily by BIDS conversion errors, image quality flags, and preprocessing- or motion-related failures. The open-source pipeline described in this work produces one of the largest pre-processed, quality controlled, and analysis-ready functional and structural MRI datasets yet available for studying aging and AD. It lowers barriers to large-cohort and longitudinal neuroimaging research and supports large-scale neuroimaging biomarker discovery in AD.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 22 of the 62 points it could be judged on, which is 35 of 100. Raw total 35 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 35 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 35 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 35 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (Research Square)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 22 / 62 Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 35 out of 100.
Total 35 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Rutherford, S., Zahid, Z., Welsh, R. C., Avena-Koenigsberger, A., Hammers, D. B., Koppelmans, V., et al. (2026). A Pipeline for ADNI Resting-State Functional MRI Processing and Quality Control. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11132707/v1

Vancouver

Rutherford S, Zahid Z, Welsh RC, Avena-Koenigsberger A, Hammers DB, Koppelmans V, et al. A Pipeline for ADNI Resting-State Functional MRI Processing and Quality Control. Research Square. 2026. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11132707/v1.

BibTeX

@article{rutherford2026-ae90252d,
  author  = {Rutherford, S. and Zahid, Z. and Welsh, R. C. and Avena-Koenigsberger, A. and Hammers, D. B. and Koppelmans, V. and Mejia, A. F. and {Initiative ADN}},
  title   = {{A Pipeline for ADNI Resting-State Functional MRI Processing and Quality Control}},
  journal = {Research Square},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-11132707/v1},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11132707/v1}
}

Related studies in Long-term cohort studies

Also tagged “diffusion”

171 studies in the library carry the topic tag “diffusion”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 171 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Long-term cohort studies

See all studies in Long-term cohort studies →