Home › Research › Mild cognitive impairment
Neuro-JEPA: Building and Evaluating Health-System Scale Neuroimaging Foundation Models with Mixture of Experts
Huang H, Chen L, Chen J, Hyun J, Loftus J, Melmed K, Orringer D, Frontera J et al.. Research Square, 2026-10-15
Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain routinely combines complementary contrasts—including T1-weighted (T1w), T2-weighted (T2w) and FLAIR sequences—to capture anatomy and pathology. Although foundation models trained on large neuroimaging datasets have shown promise, it remains unclear whether they effectively integrate these complementary contrasts across diverse clinical settings. Here we present Neuro-JEPA, a multimodal foundation model that learns unified representations across structural brain MRIs. Neuro-JEPA combines latent predictive learning with a sparse Mixture-of-Experts architecture to encode multiple MRI contrasts within a single model. The model is pretrained on 1.55 million scans from 428,647 clinical imaging studies spanning T1w, T2w and FLAIR sequences. The model performance is evaluated on 47 downstream tasks across three independent health systems and 12 public datasets, encompassing single-contrast, multimodal and cross-domain applications. Across these evaluations, Neuro-JEPA achieved the strongest overall performance and generalized robustly across heterogeneous cohorts, outperforming existing neuroimaging foundation models and strong conventional baselines in the majority of comparisons despite using less than one-third of the pretraining data of leading models. Performance gains were particularly pronounced in data-scarce settings, reaching up to 15% over prior foundation models for clinically important pathologies including gliosis and multiple sclerosis. Neuro-JEPA showed clinically relevant capabilities across domains, including prediction of amyloid status and progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease dementia, stroke identification and classification, and prediction of post-stroke functional outcome and length of stay. Together, these results show that data scale, curation and principled model design can act synergistically to produce broadly transferable neuroimaging representations, and establish Neuro-JEPA as a scalable framework toward general-purpose multimodal foundation models for neurological imaging.
Key findings
- Across these evaluations, Neuro-JEPA achieved the strongest overall performance and generalized robustly across heterogeneous cohorts, outperforming existing neuroimaging foundation models and strong conventional baselines in the majority of comparisons despite using less than one-third of the pretraining data of leading models.
- Together, these results show that data scale, curation and principled model design can act synergistically to produce broadly transferable neuroimaging representations, and establish Neuro-JEPA as a scalable framework toward general-purpose multimodal foundation models for neurological imaging.
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 16/100
Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 21 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 21 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 2 / 10 | Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (Research Square) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 4 / 10 | Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server. |
| How recent | 5 / 5 | 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 13 / 62 | Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 21 out of 100. |
| Total | 21 / 100 | Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article. |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Huang, H., Chen, L., Chen, J., Hyun, J., Loftus, J., Melmed, K., et al. (2026). Neuro-JEPA: Building and Evaluating Health-System Scale Neuroimaging Foundation Models with Mixture of Experts. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11130462/v1
Vancouver
Huang H, Chen L, Chen J, Hyun J, Loftus J, Melmed K, et al. Neuro-JEPA: Building and Evaluating Health-System Scale Neuroimaging Foundation Models with Mixture of Experts. Research Square. 2026. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11130462/v1.
BibTeX
@article{huang2026-e8078740,
author = {Huang, H. and Chen, L. and Chen, J. and Hyun, J. and Loftus, J. and Melmed, K. and Orringer, D. and Frontera, J. and others},
title = {{Neuro-JEPA: Building and Evaluating Health-System Scale Neuroimaging Foundation Models with Mixture of Experts}},
journal = {Research Square},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-11130462/v1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11130462/v1}
}
Related studies in Mild cognitive impairment
Also tagged “convolutional”
205 studies in the library carry the topic tag “convolutional”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 205 tagged studies.