Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is projected to experience the fastest growth in dementia burden globally, yet population-based data on cognitive aging remain scarce. We present the implementation and psychometric evaluation of a comprehensive cognitive assessment in the Lebanon Study on Aging and Health (LSAHA), the first large-scale, population-based study of cognitive aging and dementia in an Arab country. We implemented a construct-centered adaptation of the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP), integrating culturally-relevant and field-informed adaptation and implementation procedures. The battery was administered in a large, socioeconomically and educationally diverse sample of older adults in Lebanon (n=3,027). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were used to evaluate psychometric performance. CFA results demonstrated good to excellent model fit across general and domain-specific cognition. Cognitive scores showed expected trajectories across age, education, and subjective health and memory indicators. Findings were consistent with HCAP studies across multiple countries, supporting cross-national comparability. This study establishes a foundational infrastructure for cognitive aging research in Lebanon and the broader Middle-East and North Africa (MENA) region and demonstrates the feasibility and value of adapting HCAP for underrepresented populations.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study adapted and evaluated a comprehensive cognitive assessment battery in an Arabic-speaking population in Lebanon and found good to excellent model fit. It establishes research infrastructure for cognitive aging and does not test any treatment, cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 28 of the 94 points it could be judged on, which is 30 of 100. Raw total 30 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 30 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 30 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on impact for its field and year, so that was left out: it earned 28 of the 94 points we could judge it on, which is 30 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (medRxiv (preprint))
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 3,027 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Carlos F. Mendes de Leon: h-index 78 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Michigan: institution h-index 2,240 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 28 / 94 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 28 of the 94 points we could judge it on is 30 out of 100.
Total 30 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Elbejjani, M., El Asmar, K., Chaaya, M., Sanjar, G., El Sammak, A., Langa, K., et al. (2026). Implementation and Evaluation of the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol in an Arabic-Speaking Population: The Lebanon Study on Aging and Health (LSAHA). medRxiv (preprint). https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.02.26362058

Vancouver

Elbejjani M, El Asmar K, Chaaya M, Sanjar G, El Sammak A, Langa K, et al. Implementation and Evaluation of the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol in an Arabic-Speaking Population: The Lebanon Study on Aging and Health (LSAHA). medRxiv (preprint). 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.09.02.26362058.

BibTeX

@article{elbejjani2026-676d068e,
  author  = {Elbejjani, M. and El Asmar, K. and Chaaya, M. and Sanjar, G. and El Sammak, A. and Langa, K. and McCall, S. and Sibai, Mehio and others},
  title   = {{Implementation and Evaluation of the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol in an Arabic-Speaking Population: The Lebanon Study on Aging and Health (LSAHA)}},
  journal = {medRxiv (preprint)},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.64898/2026.09.02.26362058},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.02.26362058}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “assessment”

840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “assessment”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →