Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 38 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Various missing codes were used to document reasons for missingness. Overall, the rates of missingness were low, around 15% of observations in studies for India and China, and up to 7% for other countries. Item-level missingness and missing subinterviews (neurocognitive assessments on the older adults or their informants' reports) were imputed using chained equations. Dementia classification was also imputed for individuals in the parent studies from the Health and Retirement Study-International Family Studies (HRS-IFS), of which the HCAPs are substudies. The current practice worked well in the HCAP studies. We include concrete recommendations on best practices for study design, data collection, and post hoc treatments to mitigate challenges due to missing data, and for use and reporting of the imputed HCAP data.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Meijer, E., & Liu, Y. (2025). Missing data and imputation in the international studies following the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf223

Vancouver

Meijer E, Liu Y. Missing data and imputation in the international studies following the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 2025. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbaf223. PMID: 41454986.

BibTeX

@article{meijer2025-41454986,
  author  = {Meijer, Erik and Liu, Ying},
  title   = {{Missing data and imputation in the international studies following the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol}},
  journal = {The Journals of Gerontology Series B},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1093/geronb/gbaf223},
  pmid    = {41454986},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaf223}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This paper describes that missing data rates in international Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol studies were low, and item-level missingness was imputed using chained equations. The current practice worked well, and the authors include recommendations for best practices in study design, data collection, and reporting of imputed data.

Study details

How this study scored 38/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 38 of 100.38 of 100 points earned62 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The Journals of Gerontology Series B)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 The Journals of Gerontology Series B: journal h-index 225 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Ying Liu: h-index 25 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Southern California: institution h-index 1,521 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41454986)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 38 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “examination”

840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “examination”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →