Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 40 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) are preclinical stages of Alzheimer's Disease (AD), which is the most common entity of dementia. Homocysteine is an amino acid in the methionine cycle, and many studies revealed a significant association between elevated homocysteine serum levels and the progression of dementia. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to investigate whether elevated homocysteine serum levels could be associated with mortality and neuropsychological test results in individuals suffering from SCD, MCI or AD. Methods This study is a single-center explorative retrospective data analysis with 976 data protocols from the Memory Outpatient's Clinic of the Medical University of Vienna included. All patients underwent a neurological examination, a laboratory blood test, and neuropsychological testing to establish a diagnosis of either SCD, MCI, or AD. Data was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier functions, factor analysis, and binary logistic regression models. Results Patients with AD showed significantly higher mean homocysteine levels (SCD 12.15 ± 4.71, MCI 12.80 ± 4.81, AD 15.0 ± 6.44 μmol/L) compared to those with SCD and MCI (p ≤ .001). The mean age of patients with AD (75.2 ± 7.8) was significantly older at the time of testing than of patients with MCI (69.1 ± 9.6) or SCD (66.8 ± 9.3). Since homocysteine levels increase with age, this could be a possible explanation for the higher levels of AD patients. The age at death did not differ significantly between all diagnostic subgroups, resulting in the shortest survival times for AD patients. Homocysteine levels were negatively associated with in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Neuropsyhcological Test Battery Vienna (NTBV) factors F1-F4 (F1 = attention, F2 = memory, F3 = executive functions, F4 = naming/verbal comprehension). Moreover, higher homocysteine levels significantly predicted shorter five-year survival in the logistic regression models, even after adjusting for age, diagnostic subgroups, sex, years of education and results of neuropsychological testing. Conclusion The results of this study suggest that homocysteine levels are independently associated with impaired cognitive function and increased five-year mortality.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Futschek, I. E., Schernhammer, E., Haslacher, H., Stögmann, E., & Lehrner, J. (2023). Homocysteine - A predictor for five year-mortality in patients with subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's dementia. Experimental gerontology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2022.112045

Vancouver

Futschek IE, Schernhammer E, Haslacher H, Stögmann E, Lehrner J. Homocysteine - A predictor for five year-mortality in patients with subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's dementia. Experimental gerontology. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.exger.2022.112045. PMID: 36509298.

BibTeX

@article{futschek2023-36509298,
  author  = {Futschek, I. E. and Schernhammer, E. and Haslacher, H. and Stögmann, E. and Lehrner, J.},
  title   = {{Homocysteine - A predictor for five year-mortality in patients with subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's dementia}},
  journal = {Experimental gerontology},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.exger.2022.112045},
  pmid    = {36509298},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2022.112045}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 40/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 23 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 40 of 100. Total 40 of 100.23 of the 58 points we could judge = 40 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Experimental gerontology)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 36509298)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 23 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100.
Total 40 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “predictors”

3 studies in the library carry the topic tag “predictors”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 3 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →