Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 55 out of 100. Genetics

Topic: Genetics and APOE

MOTIVATION: With the emerging of high-dimensional genomic data, genetic analysis such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have played an important role in identifying disease-related genetic variants and novel treatments. Complex longitudinal phenotypes are commonly collected in medical studies. However, since limited analytical approaches are available for longitudinal traits, these data are often underutilized. In this article, we develop a high-throughput machine learning approach for multilocus GWAS using longitudinal traits by coupling Empirical Bayesian Estimates from mixed-effects modeling with a novel ℓ0-norm algorithm. RESULTS: Extensive simulations demonstrated that the proposed approach not only provided accurate selection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with comparable or higher power but also robust control of false positives. More importantly, this novel approach is highly scalable and could be approximately >1000 times faster than recently published approaches, making genome-wide multilocus analysis of longitudinal traits possible. In addition, our proposed approach can simultaneously analyze millions of SNPs if the computer memory allows, thereby potentially allowing a true multilocus analysis for high-dimensional genomic data. With application to the data from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, we confirmed that our approach can identify well-known SNPs associated with AD and were much faster than recently published approaches (≥6000 times). AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code and the testing datasets are available at https://github.com/Myuan2019/EBE_APML0. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 55/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 31 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 55 of 100. Total 55 of 100.31 of the 56 points we could judge = 55 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 31 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 55 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Bioinformatics (Oxford, England))
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 32096821)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 31 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 31 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 55 out of 100.
Total 55 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Xu, H., Li, X., Yang, Y., Li, Y., Pinheiro, J., Sasser, K., et al. (2020). High-throughput and efficient multilocus genome-wide association study on longitudinal outcomes. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa120

Vancouver

Xu H, Li X, Yang Y, Li Y, Pinheiro J, Sasser K, et al. High-throughput and efficient multilocus genome-wide association study on longitudinal outcomes. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2020. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa120. PMID: 32096821.

BibTeX

@article{xu2020-32096821,
  author  = {Xu, Huang and Li, Xiang and Yang, Yaning and Li, Yi and Pinheiro, Jose and Sasser, Kate and Hamadeh, Hisham and Steven, Xu and others},
  title   = {{High-throughput and efficient multilocus genome-wide association study on longitudinal outcomes}},
  journal = {Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)},
  year    = {2020},
  doi     = {10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa120},
  pmid    = {32096821},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa120}
}

Related studies in Genetics

Also tagged “genetics”

346 studies in the library carry the topic tag “genetics”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 346 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Genetics

See all studies in Genetics →