Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 38 out of 100. Drug development

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion (CCH) affects the aging population and especially patients with neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease or Parkinson's disease. CCH is closely related to the cognitive dysfunction in these diseases. Glucagon-like peptide-2 receptor (GLP2R) mRNA and protein are highly expressed in the gut and in hippocampal neurons. This receptor is involved in the regulation of food intake and the control of energy balance and glucose homeostasis. The present study employed behavioral techniques, electrophysiology, western blotting, immunohistochemistry, quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and Golgi staining to investigate whether the expression of GLP2R changes after CCH and whether GLP2R is involved in cognitive impairment caused by CCH. Our findings show that CCH significantly decreased hippocampal GLP2R mRNA and protein levels. GLP2R upregulation could prevent CCH-induced cognitive impairment. It also improved the CCH-induced impairment of long-term potentiation and long-term depression. Additionally, GLP2R modulated after CCH the AKT-mTOR-p70S6K pathway in the hippocampus. Moreover, an upregulation of the GLP2R increased the neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus, neuronal activity, and density of dendritic spines and mushroom spines in hippocampal neurons. Our findings reveal the involvement of GLP2R via a modulation of the AKT-mTOR-p70S6K pathway in the mechanisms underlying CCH-induced impairments of spatial learning and memory. We suggest that the GLP2R and the AKT-mTOR-p70S6K pathway in the hippocampus are promising targets to treat cognition deficits in CCH.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Xie, Y. C., Yao, Z. H., Yao, X. L., Pan, J. Z., Zhang, S. F., Zhang, Y., et al. (2018). Glucagon-Like Peptide-2 Receptor is Involved in Spatial Cognitive Dysfunction in Rats After Chronic Cerebral Hypoperfusion. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-180782

Vancouver

Xie YC, Yao ZH, Yao XL, Pan JZ, Zhang SF, Zhang Y, et al. Glucagon-Like Peptide-2 Receptor is Involved in Spatial Cognitive Dysfunction in Rats After Chronic Cerebral Hypoperfusion. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD. 2018. doi:10.3233/jad-180782. PMID: 30452417.

BibTeX

@article{xie2018-30452417,
  author  = {Xie, Y. C. and Yao, Z. H. and Yao, X. L. and Pan, J. Z. and Zhang, S. F. and Zhang, Y. and Hu, J. C.},
  title   = {{Glucagon-Like Peptide-2 Receptor is Involved in Spatial Cognitive Dysfunction in Rats After Chronic Cerebral Hypoperfusion}},
  journal = {Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD},
  year    = {2018},
  doi     = {10.3233/jad-180782},
  pmid    = {30452417},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-180782}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 38/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 22 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 38 of 100. Total 38 of 100.22 of the 58 points we could judge = 38 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 38 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2018 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Laboratory or animal study (title names “rats”) — scores zero
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 30452417)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 22 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 38 out of 100.
Total 38 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Drug development

Also tagged “cerebral-hypoperfusion”

3 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cerebral-hypoperfusion”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 3 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Drug development

See all studies in Drug development →