Home › Research › Drug development
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for major neurocognitive disorders
De Giorgi R, Ghenciulescu A, Yotter C, Taquet M, Koychev I.. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2025-08-14
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Disease-modifying treatments for major neurocognitive disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and other cognitive deficits, are among the main unmet needs in modern medicine. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), currently licensed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity, offer a novel, multilayered mechanism for intervention in neurodegeneration through intermediate, aetiology-agnostic pathways, likely involving metabolic, inflammatory and several other relevant neurobiological processes. In vitro and animal studies have revealed promising signals of neuroprotection, with preliminary supportive evidence emerging from recent pharmacoepidemiological investigations and clinical trials. In this article, we comprehensively review studies that investigate the impact of GLP-1RAs on the various aetiologies of cognitive impairment and dementia syndromes. Focusing on evidence from human studies, we highlight how brain energy homeostasis, neurogenesis, synaptic functioning, neuroinflammation and other cellular stress responses, pathological protein aggregates, proteostasis, cerebrovascular system and blood-brain barrier dynamics may underlie GLP-1RA putative neuroprotective effects. We then report and appraise evidence from clinical studies, including observational investigations, clinical trials and pooled analyses. Finally, we discuss current challenges and perspectives ahead for research and clinical implementation of GLP-1RAs for the care of people with major neurocognitive disorders, including their individual brain penetrance potential, the need for response biomarkers and disease stage-based indications, their possible non-specific effects on brain health, their profile in terms of adverse events and other unwanted effects, the lack of long-term data for efficacy and safety, and issues surrounding cost and availability of treatment.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
De Giorgi, R., Ghenciulescu, A., Yotter, C., Taquet, M., & Koychev, I. (2025). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for major neurocognitive disorders. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2024-335593
Vancouver
De Giorgi R, Ghenciulescu A, Yotter C, Taquet M, Koychev I. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for major neurocognitive disorders. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2025. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2024-335593. PMID: 40210453.
BibTeX
@article{degiorgi2025-40210453,
author = {De Giorgi, R. and Ghenciulescu, A. and Yotter, C. and Taquet, M. and Koychev, I.},
title = {{Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for major neurocognitive disorders}},
journal = {Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1136/jnnp-2024-335593},
pmid = {40210453},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2024-335593}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- In vitro and animal studies have revealed promising signals of neuroprotection, with preliminary supportive evidence emerging from recent pharmacoepidemiological investigations and clinical trials.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 45/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 45 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40210453) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 26 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 45 out of 100. |
| Total | 45 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Drug development
Also tagged “major-neurocognitive”
2 studies in the library carry the topic tag “major-neurocognitive”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 2 tagged studies.