Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 76 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Among the 6514 participants (mean age, 69.5 years; 50.5% female), median follow-up time ranged from 1.5 to 4.0 years. Of 3487 cognitively unimpaired participants, 349 (9.8%) were tau PET positive; the estimated frequency of tau PET positivity was less than 1% in those aged younger than 50 years, and increased from 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) at 60 years to 19% (95% CI, 16%-24%) at 90 years. Tau PET positivity frequency estimates increased across MCI and AD dementia clinical diagnoses (43% [95% CI, 41%-46%] and 79% [95% CI, 77%-82%] at 75 years, respectively). Most tau PET-positive individuals (92%) were also Aβ PET positive. Cognitively unimpaired participants who were positive for both Aβ PET and tau PET had a higher absolute risk of progression to MCI or dementia over the following 5 years (57% [95% CI, 45%-71%]) compared with both Aβ PET-positive/tau PET-negative (17% [95% CI, 13%-22%]) and Aβ PET-negative/tau PET-negative (6% [95% CI, 5%-8%]) individuals. Among participants with MCI at the time of the tau PET scan, an Aβ PET-positive/tau PET-positive profile was associated with a 5-year absolute risk of progression to dementia of 70% (95% CI, 59%-81%). Conclusions and Relevance: In a large convenience sample, a positive tau PET scan occurred at a nonnegligible rate among cognitively unimpaired individuals, and the combination of Aβ PET positivity and tau PET positivity was associated with a high risk of clinical progression in both preclinical and symptomatic stages of AD. These findings underscore the potential of tau PET as a biomarker for staging AD pathology.

Key findings

Why it matters

In 6,514 people, a positive tau PET scan was rare before age 50 but was estimated at 19% of cognitively unimpaired people by age 90, and at 79% of people with Alzheimer's dementia at age 75. Among cognitively unimpaired people, those positive on both amyloid and tau PET had an estimated 57% five-year risk of developing MCI or dementia, compared with 17% for amyloid-positive/tau-negative and 6% for people negative on both. The authors note this was a convenience sample and describe tau PET as a promising staging marker. These are associations, not a prediction for any one person.

Study details

How this study scored 76/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 10 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 6 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 76 of 100.76 of 100 points earned24 not earned

Published in a top-tier journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 10 / 10 Tier 1 — top-tier general journal (JAMA)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 JAMA: journal h-index 1,011 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 6,514 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 66 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 22.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 6 / 6 Cited 41.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 7 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 66 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Vasavan P. Nair: h-index 18 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Harvard University: institution h-index 3,235 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 54 institution(s) in 10 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40522652)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 76 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Moscoso, A., Heeman, F., Raghavan, S., Costoya‐Sánchez, A., van Essen, M., Mainta, I., et al. (2025). Frequency and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Tau Positron Emission Tomography Positivity. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.7817

Vancouver

Moscoso A, Heeman F, Raghavan S, Costoya‐Sánchez A, van Essen M, Mainta I, et al. Frequency and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Tau Positron Emission Tomography Positivity. JAMA. 2025. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.7817. PMID: 40522652.

BibTeX

@article{moscoso2025-40522652,
  author  = {Moscoso, Alexis and Heeman, Fiona and Raghavan, Sheelakumari and Costoya‐Sánchez, Alejandro and van Essen, Martijn and Mainta, Ismini and Camacho, Valle and Rodríguez-Fonseca, Omar Darío and others},
  title   = {{Frequency and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Tau Positron Emission Tomography Positivity}},
  journal = {JAMA},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1001/jama.2025.7817},
  pmid    = {40522652},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.7817}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 27.

Later studies that cite this one

7 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Also tagged “phosphorylated”

732 studies in the library carry the topic tag “phosphorylated”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 732 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →