Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 40 out of 100. Drug development

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Background and objective Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) patients are more prone to develop Alzheimer's Disease (AD). We have previously shown that Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exendin-4 (Ex-4) reduces tau hyperphosphorylation in T2D animals through upregulating insulin signaling, and peripheral injected Ex-4 increases insulin levels in the T2D brain. This study aims to further clarify whether the elevated insulin in the brain is produced by nerve cells under the action of Ex-4. Methods The neuronal cell line-HT22 was treated with Ex-4 under high glucose or normal cultivation, and the number of insulin-positive cells as well as the expression levels of insulin synthesis-related genes were examined. The db/db mice were treated with the peripheral injection of Ex-4 and/or IntraCerebroVentricular (ICV) injection of siRNA to inhibit the expression of insulin synthesis- related genes and the behavior tests were carried on. Finally, plasma glucose, Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) glucose, CSF insulin, phosphorylation of tau, phosphorylation of AKT and GSK-3β of db/db mice were detected. Results We found that Ex-4 promoted the expression of insulin synthesis-related genes and induced an obvious increase of insulin-positive HT-22 neuronal cells in a high glucose environment. Peripheral injection of Ex-4 improved the cognitive function of db/db mice and increased brain insulin levels which activated brain insulin signaling and subsequently alleviated tau hyperphosphorylation. However, when siRNA-neurod1 was injected to block insulin synthesis, the cognitive function of db/db mice was not improved under the action of Ex-4 anymore. Moreover, the brain insulin levels dropped to an extremely low level, and the phosphorylation level of tau increased significantly. Conclusion This study demonstrated that Ex-4 improved cognition function by promoting brain insulin synthesis followed by the activation of brain insulin signaling and alleviation of tau hyperphosphorylation.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Peng, X., Shi, X., Huang, J., Zhang, S., Yan, Y., Ma, D., et al. (2021). Exendin-4 Improves Cognitive Function of Diabetic Mice via Increasing Brain Insulin Synthesis. Current Alzheimer research. https://doi.org/10.2174/1567205018666210929150004

Vancouver

Peng X, Shi X, Huang J, Zhang S, Yan Y, Ma D, et al. Exendin-4 Improves Cognitive Function of Diabetic Mice via Increasing Brain Insulin Synthesis. Current Alzheimer research. 2021. doi:10.2174/1567205018666210929150004. PMID: 34587885.

BibTeX

@article{peng2021-34587885,
  author  = {Peng, X. and Shi, X. and Huang, J. and Zhang, S. and Yan, Y. and Ma, D. and Xu, W. and others},
  title   = {{Exendin-4 Improves Cognitive Function of Diabetic Mice via Increasing Brain Insulin Synthesis}},
  journal = {Current Alzheimer research},
  year    = {2021},
  doi     = {10.2174/1567205018666210929150004},
  pmid    = {34587885},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.2174/1567205018666210929150004}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 40/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 23 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 40 of 100. Total 40 of 100.23 of the 58 points we could judge = 40 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Current Alzheimer research)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Laboratory or animal study (title names “mice”) — scores zero
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 34587885)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 23 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100.
Total 40 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Drug development

Also tagged “diabetic-mice”

3 studies in the library carry the topic tag “diabetic-mice”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 3 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Drug development

See all studies in Drug development →