Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 29 out of 100. Drug development

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Risk of Alzheimer disease is increased in patients with diabetes. Insulin resistance is identified as a pathogenic mechanism of impaired cognitive dysfunction. Amyloid beta oligomers cause impaired insulin signaling at IRS-1 via mechanisms of TNFalpha and JNK activation.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Sasaoka, T., Wada, T., & Tsuneki, H. (2014). [Insulin resistance and cognitive function]. Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

Vancouver

Sasaoka T, Wada T, Tsuneki H. [Insulin resistance and cognitive function]. Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine. 2014. PMID: 24796090.

BibTeX

@article{sasaoka2014-24796090,
  author  = {Sasaoka, T. and Wada, T. and Tsuneki, H.},
  title   = {{[Insulin resistance and cognitive function]}},
  journal = {Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine},
  year    = {2014},
  pmid    = {24796090}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. This record has no DOI, so the citation leaves it out. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This paper identifies insulin resistance as a mechanism of impaired cognitive dysfunction and notes that risk of Alzheimer disease is increased in patients with diabetes. It describes how amyloid beta oligomers impair insulin signaling and how attenuation of the PI-3 kinase pathway is involved in tau hyperphosphorylation.

Study details

How this study scored 29/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 25 of the 87 points it could be judged on, which is 29 of 100. Total 29 of 100.25 of the 87 points we could judge = 29 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, impact for its field and year and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 25 of the 87 points we could judge it on, which is 29 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2014 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 12 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.9 citations a year over 14 year(s) since 2014
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Hiroshi Tsuneki: h-index 38 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 24796090)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 25 / 87 Scored on 17 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 25 of the 87 points we could judge it on is 29 out of 100.
Total 29 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Related studies in Drug development

Also in Drug development

79 studies in the library are filed under Drug development with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Drug development hub.

Similar studies

More on Drug development

See all studies in Drug development →