Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 76 out of 100. Drug development

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia. At present, some drug and non-drug therapies can be used to slow disease progression or prevent cognitive deterioration. More treatment options still need to be explored. Objectives A meta-analysis was performed to compile the relevant evidence for the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in preventing AD. Material and methods We systematically searched English and Chinese databases, including Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and Weipu website (VIP), based on the PICOS (Participants, Interventions, Comparisons, Outcomes, Study design) principles. The reviewers evaluated the search results and conducted the analysis; 5 articles with a total sample size of 184 patients were included. Changes in cognitive function, body mass index (BMI), blood glucose level, and insulin content were analyzed. Results A low risk of bias and no publication bias were found in these studies. The following results were obtained: 1) cognitive function: mean difference (MD) = 2.16, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.45-2.88; 2) BMI change: MD = -1.16, 95% CI: -1.71--0.61; and 3) blood glucose change: standard MD (SMD) = -0.64, 95% CI: -1.21--0.88. No statistically significant difference was found in insulin content. Conclusion In this review, we showed that GLP-1 receptor agonists can effectively change cognitive function, BMI and blood glucose levels in patients with AD. This provides relevant clues for the prevention of AD. However, more studies are needed to refine these conclusions.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Bi, Z., Wang, L., & Wang, W. (2023). Evaluating the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/161734

Vancouver

Bi Z, Wang L, Wang W. Evaluating the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University. 2023. doi:10.17219/acem/161734. PMID: 37077141.

BibTeX

@article{bi2023-37077141,
  author  = {Bi, Z. and Wang, L. and Wang, W.},
  title   = {{Evaluating the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis}},
  journal = {Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.17219/acem/161734},
  pmid    = {37077141},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/161734}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 76/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 44 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 76 of 100. Total 76 of 100.44 of the 58 points we could judge = 76 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a meta-analysis pooling many studies. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 44 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 76 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 12 / 12 A meta-analysis pooling many studies
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 184 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomization is not credited here
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 37077141)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 44 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 44 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 76 out of 100.
Total 76 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Drug development

Also tagged “peptide-1-receptor”

5 studies in the library carry the topic tag “peptide-1-receptor”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 5 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Drug development

See all studies in Drug development →