Home › Research › Risk factors
Walking and Talking: Recommendations for Doing Mobile Interviews with Older Adults
Paula Carder, Raina L. Croff, Aliza Tuttle, Juell Towns. Journal of Aging and Environment, 2022-02-03
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Mobile methods, including walking interviews, have rarely been used in research with older adults. We compare and contrast two studies that engaged older adults in walking interviews conducted by the coauthors. The first study examined the meaning of food access with residents of publicly-subsidized housing, and the second involved Black Americans in a study of brain health and gentrification. Older adults, including those with physical and mild cognitive impairment, can participate in walking interviews. Key decisions and advice for researchers interested in using mobile methods with this population, including participant safety, comfort abilities, and technology use, are provided.
Key findings
- Mobile methods, including walking interviews, have rarely been used in research with older adults.
- We compare and contrast two studies that engaged older adults in walking interviews conducted by the coauthors.
- The first study examined the meaning of food access with residents of publicly-subsidized housing, and the second involved Black Americans in a study of brain health and gentrification.
- Older adults, including those with physical and mild cognitive impairment, can participate in walking interviews.
- Key decisions and advice for researchers interested in using mobile methods with this population, including participant safety, comfort abilities, and technology use, are provided.
Why it matters
This paper gives advice for researchers on doing walking interviews with older adults, including those with mild cognitive impairment. It is about research methods and does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention for Alzheimer's disease.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Risk factors, ranked →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 30/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Aging and Environment) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | Journal of Aging and Environment: journal h-index 16 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 2 / 7 | Cited 7 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 1 / 5 | 1.2 citations a year over 6 year(s) since 2022 |
| Impact for its field and year | 2 / 6 | Cited 1.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 1 / 4 | Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 0 / 4 | Last-listed author Juell Towns: h-index 2 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 1 / 3 | Oregon Health & Science University: institution h-index 1,025 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 1 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Total | 30 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Carder, P., Croff, R. L., Tuttle, A., & Towns, J. (2022). Walking and Talking: Recommendations for Doing Mobile Interviews with Older Adults. Journal of Aging and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1080/26892618.2022.2030844
Vancouver
Carder P, Croff RL, Tuttle A, Towns J. Walking and Talking: Recommendations for Doing Mobile Interviews with Older Adults. Journal of Aging and Environment. 2022. doi:10.1080/26892618.2022.2030844.
BibTeX
@article{carder2022-3b875205,
author = {Carder, Paula and Croff, Raina L. and Tuttle, Aliza and Towns, Juell},
title = {{Walking and Talking: Recommendations for Doing Mobile Interviews with Older Adults}},
journal = {Journal of Aging and Environment},
year = {2022},
doi = {10.1080/26892618.2022.2030844},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/26892618.2022.2030844}
}
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.