Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Machine learning models consistently outperformed conventional approach. For the global detection of cognitive impairment, XGBoost achieved the best performance (Youden Index 0.61 vs. 0.54 for the standard cutoff). Regarding subtype classification, models demonstrated variable discriminative capacity depending on clinical homogeneity: primary progressive aphasia was best classified (Youden ≈ 0.77), followed by Lewy body dementia and Alzheimer's disease, while vascular dementia remained more challenging to isolate. Feature importance analysis highlighted the Cognitive Quotient as a robust universal predictor, while pinpointing disease-specific drivers such as delayed recall for Alzheimer's disease and verbal fluency for primary progressive aphasia. Our findings suggest interpretable machine learning enhances diagnostic utility of the MoCA, yielding superior accuracy compared to a fixed cutoff. By synthesizing individualized subtest profiles within a transparent framework, this approach offers a clinically actionable solution. It transforms the MoCA from a simple screening tool to a precision diagnostic aid, optimizing patient triage in the era of disease-modifying therapies.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study reports that machine learning models using MoCA test data performed better than the standard cutoff for detecting cognitive impairment and classifying subtypes. It is a diagnostic aid only and does not test any treatment, cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 46/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 46 of 100.46 of 100 points earned54 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Frontiers in Neuroscience)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Frontiers in Neuroscience: journal h-index 226 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 38,746 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 14.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Robert Jr Laforce: h-index 49 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec: institution h-index 345 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41799879)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 46 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Gourdeau, C., Gourdeau, C. L., Bernier, P. J., & Laforce, R. J. (2026). Enhanced diagnostic interpretation of the MoCA using machine learning. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2026.1679649

Vancouver

Gourdeau C, Gourdeau CL, Bernier PJ, Laforce RJ. Enhanced diagnostic interpretation of the MoCA using machine learning. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2026. doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1679649. PMID: 41799879.

BibTeX

@article{gourdeau2026-41799879,
  author  = {Gourdeau, Christian and Gourdeau, Charles L. and Bernier, Patrick J. and Laforce, Robert Jr},
  title   = {{Enhanced diagnostic interpretation of the MoCA using machine learning}},
  journal = {Frontiers in Neuroscience},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.3389/fnins.2026.1679649},
  pmid    = {41799879},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2026.1679649}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →