Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 33 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Among 19 included studies, most used quantitative designs and secondary data. Our CFIR-based synthesis revealed that AWV implementation is shaped by interdependent factors across five domains. Key facilitators included AWV adaptability, Electronic Health Record (EHR) integration, team-based workflows, policy alignment (e.g., Accountable Care Organization participation), and provider confidence. Barriers included vague Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance, limited reimbursement, staffing shortages, workflow misalignment, and provider discomfort with cognitive screening. Implementation strategies were often poorly defined or inconsistently applied. Effective AWV delivery for older adults with cognitive impairment requires more than sound policy and intervention design; it demands organizational readiness, structured implementation, and engaged providers. Tailored training, leadership support, and integrated infrastructure are essential. These insights are relevant not only for U.S. Medicare but also for global efforts to integrate dementia-sensitive care into primary health systems. Our study has a few limitations that should be acknowledged. First, our scoping review synthesized findings predominantly from quantitative studies, with only two mixed-method studies and no studies using strictly qualitative methodologies. Second, few studies disaggregated findings by race, ethnicity, or geography, reducing our ability to assess equity-related outcomes. Moreover, few studies provided sufficient detail on the specific cognitive screening instruments used or on the scope and delivery of educational materials for patients and caregivers, limiting generalizability and implementation insights. Third, grey literature and non-peer-reviewed sources were not included. Fourth, although CFIR provided a comprehensive analytic structure, some studies did not explicitly fit in with our implementation frameworks, which required subjective mapping of findings to CFIR domains and may have introduced classification bias. Additionally, although our review did not quantitatively stratify findings by year, we observed that studies from more recent years were more likely to emphasize implementation facilitators (e.g., use of templates, workflow integration), whereas earlier studies often highlighted systemic barriers such as time constraints and provider unfamiliarity with AWV components. Finally, while our review focused specifically on AWV implementation in the

Key findings

Why it matters

This scoping review examined factors helping or hindering Annual Wellness Visits for detection and management of cognitive impairment among older adults. It addresses detection and implementation in primary care, not treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 33/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 33 of 100.33 of 100 points earned67 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy))
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Nursing Reports: journal h-index 37 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-17)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 3.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Huey‐Ming Tzeng: h-index 30 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston: institution h-index 651 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40863682)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 33 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Udoka, O., Hannah, F., Yong-Fang, K., Raji Mukaila, A., Elise, P., & Huey-Ming, T. (2025). What Helps or Hinders Annual Wellness Visits for Detection and Management of Cognitive Impairment Among Older Adults? A Scoping Review Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy). https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080295

Vancouver

Udoka O, Hannah F, Yong-Fang K, Raji Mukaila A, Elise P, Huey-Ming T. What Helps or Hinders Annual Wellness Visits for Detection and Management of Cognitive Impairment Among Older Adults? A Scoping Review Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy). 2025. doi:10.3390/nursrep15080295. PMID: 40863682.

BibTeX

@article{udoka2025-40863682,
  author  = {Udoka, Okpalauwaekwe and Hannah, Franks and Yong-Fang, Kuo and Raji Mukaila, A. and Elise, Passy and Huey-Ming, Tzeng},
  title   = {{What Helps or Hinders Annual Wellness Visits for Detection and Management of Cognitive Impairment Among Older Adults? A Scoping Review Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research}},
  journal = {Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy)},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.3390/nursrep15080295},
  pmid    = {40863682},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080295}
}

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also tagged “cognitive-function”

1,118 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cognitive-function”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,118 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →