Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 76 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Plain-language summary

Whilst cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers for amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau pathologies are accurate for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), their broad implementation in clinical and trial settings are restricted by high cost and limited accessibility. Plasma phosphorylated-tau181 (p-tau181) is a promising blood-based biomarker that is specific for AD, correlates with cerebral Aβ and tau pathology, and predicts future cognitive decline. In this study, we report the performance of p-tau181 in >1000 individuals from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), including cognitively unimpaired (CU), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD dementia patients characterized by Aβ PET. We confirmed that plasma p-tau181 is increased at the preclinical stage of Alzheimer and further increases in MCI and AD dementia. Individuals clinically classified as AD dementia but having negative Aβ PET scans show little increase but plasma p-tau181 is increased if CSF Aβ has already changed prior to Aβ PET changes. Despite being a multicenter study, plasma p-tau181 demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy to identify AD dementia (AUC = 85.3%; 95% CI, 81.4-89.2%), as well as to distinguish between Aβ- and Aβ+ individuals along the Alzheimer's continuum (AUC = 76.9%; 95% CI, 74.0-79.8%). Higher baseline concentrations of plasma p-tau181 accurately predicted future dementia and performed comparably to the baseline prediction of CSF p-tau181. Longitudinal measurements of plasma p-tau181 revealed low intra-individual variability, which could be of potential benefit in disease-modifying trials seeking a measurable response to a therapeutic target. This study adds significant weight to the growing body of evidence in the use of plasma p-tau181 as a non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic tool for AD, regardless of clinical stage, which would be of great benefit in clinical practice and a large cost-saving in clinical trial recruitment.

What this study adds

Evidence grade: Moderate

This is a follow-up (cohort) study of 1,000 participants. In more than 1000 people from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, blood p-tau181 was already raised before symptoms in people with amyloid on PET and rose further in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's dementia. Reported effect size: AUC = 85.3; 89.2%; AUC = 76.9.

Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Karikari, T. K., Benedet, A. L., Ashton, N. J., Lantero Rodriguez, J., Snellman, A., Suárez-Calvet, M., et al. (2021). Diagnostic performance and prediction of clinical progression of plasma phospho-tau181 in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Molecular psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-00923-z

Vancouver

Karikari TK, Benedet AL, Ashton NJ, Lantero Rodriguez J, Snellman A, Suárez-Calvet M, et al. Diagnostic performance and prediction of clinical progression of plasma phospho-tau181 in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Molecular psychiatry. 2021. doi:10.1038/s41380-020-00923-z. PMID: 33106600.

BibTeX

@article{karikari2021-33106600,
  author  = {Karikari, T. K. and Benedet, A. L. and Ashton, N. J. and Lantero Rodriguez, J. and Snellman, A. and Suárez-Calvet, M. and Saha-Chaudhuri, P. and Lussier, F. and others},
  title   = {{Diagnostic performance and prediction of clinical progression of plasma phospho-tau181 in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative}},
  journal = {Molecular psychiatry},
  year    = {2021},
  doi     = {10.1038/s41380-020-00923-z},
  pmid    = {33106600},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-00923-z}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In more than 1000 people from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, blood p-tau181 was already raised before symptoms in people with amyloid on PET and rose further in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's dementia. It separated Alzheimer's dementia well (AUC 85.3%) but amyloid-positive from amyloid-negative people less well (AUC 76.9%), and higher baseline levels predicted later dementia about as well as the spinal-fluid p-tau181 test. These are group-level results from a research cohort with no stated cut-off, so they do not show that one blood result can diagnose or forecast Alzheimer's in an individual.

Study details

How this study scored 76/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 5 of 6; Cited by studies here 4 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 73 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 76 of 100. Total 76 of 100.73 of the 96 points we could judge = 76 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 73 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 76 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Molecular psychiatry)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Molecular Psychiatry: journal h-index 318 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,000 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 349 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 49.9 citations a year over 7 year(s) since 2021
Impact for its field and year 5 / 6 Cited 33.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 4 / 6 Cited by 37 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 139 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University College London: institution h-index 2,029 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 21 institution(s) in 6 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 33106600)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 73 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 73 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 76 out of 100.
Total 76 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 26.

Later studies that cite this one

37 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis from nearby years

Also tagged “phosphorylated”

732 studies in the library carry the topic tag “phosphorylated”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 732 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →