Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Costs and economics

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Plain-language summary

Background and objectives Family caregivers in the United States provide substantial value of unpaid care to older adults while less recognized are the employment-related costs they endure and the trajectory of these costs. We estimate the replacement cost of unpaid family caregiving to U.S. adults aged 70 and older with and without dementia and the opportunity costs of forgone earnings and lost productivity between 2011 and 2060. Research design and methods We match caregivers to older adults from the National Study of Caregiving with similar noncaregivers from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. We use population projections alongside current and historical data on educational attainment, wages, inflation, and average wages for in-home care aides to approximate total replacement and opportunity costs. Results Current annual replacement cost of unpaid family care is between $96 and $182 billion, 44% of which is accounted for by dementia caregiving. By 2060, it will increase to $277-571 billion, and 53% will be for dementia caregiving. The opportunity costs of forgone earnings and productivity loss, however, will grow faster, increasing from current levels of $107 billion and $26 billion to $380 billion and $102 billion, respectively, in 2060. Projections show that opportunity costs of family caregiving will be increasingly borne by caregivers of older adults with dementia and racial/ethnic minoritized caregivers. Discussion and implications As the employment-related opportunity costs of family caregiving for older adults are on a trajectory to become increasingly similar in value to associated replacement costs of unpaid care, policymakers, health insurance payers, and employers should focus on supporting unpaid family caregivers to remain attached to the labor force through efforts such as strengthening paid family leave options, expanding consumer-directed in-home services options, and offering increased work flexibility.

What this study adds

Evidence grade: Moderate

This modelling study estimated the current annual replacement cost of unpaid family care at between $96 and $182 billion, 44% of which is accounted for by dementia caregiving, projected to rise to $277-571 billion by 2060 with 53% for dementia caregiving. Reported effect size: Replacement cost $96-182 billion/year now, $277-571 billion by 2060; dementia share 44% rising to 53%.

Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Mudrazija, S., & Aranda, M. P. (2025). Current and Future Replacement and Opportunity Costs of Family Caregiving for Older Americans With and Without Dementia. Innovation in Aging. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf049

Vancouver

Mudrazija S, Aranda MP. Current and Future Replacement and Opportunity Costs of Family Caregiving for Older Americans With and Without Dementia. Innovation in Aging. 2025. doi:10.1093/geroni/igaf049. PMID: 40662057.

BibTeX

@article{mudrazija2025-40662057,
  author  = {Mudrazija, S. and Aranda, M. P.},
  title   = {{Current and Future Replacement and Opportunity Costs of Family Caregiving for Older Americans With and Without Dementia}},
  journal = {Innovation in Aging},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1093/geroni/igaf049},
  pmid    = {40662057},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf049}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This modelling study estimated the current annual replacement cost of unpaid family care at between $96 and $182 billion, 44% of which is accounted for by dementia caregiving, projected to rise to $277-571 billion by 2060 with 53% for dementia caregiving. It also projected that opportunity costs of forgone earnings and productivity loss will grow faster, so it concerns caregiving economics rather than treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

Limitations

Dementia in NHATS is classified from respondent or proxy report and cognitive tests rather than clinical diagnosis, so misclassification is possible; unpaid care was valued at minimum and replacement wages without accounting for efficiency gains of professional care or the intrinsic value of family care; and data did not allow assessment of caregiver burden on government programmes, lost fringe benefits or forgone retirement savings.

How this study scored 47/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 3 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 46 of the 98 points it could be judged on, which is 47 of 100. Total 47 of 100.46 of the 98 points we could judge = 47 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a computer model rather than new measurements. Scored zero for sample size, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 46 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 47 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Innovation in Aging)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Innovation in Aging: journal h-index 48 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 3 / 12 A computer model rather than new measurements
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 5 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 9.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 5 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author María Aranda: h-index 32 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 University of Washington: institution h-index 3,540 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40662057)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 46 / 98 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 46 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 47 out of 100.
Total 47 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Costs and economics from nearby years

Also tagged “nursing”

995 studies in the library carry the topic tag “nursing”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 995 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Costs and economics

See all studies in Costs and economics →