Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 61 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Objective To analyze the clinical utility of 3 CSF biomarkers and their structural imaging correlates in a large cohort of patients with different dementia and parkinsonian syndromes within the spectrum of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Methods We analyzed 3 CSF biomarkers (YKL-40, soluble β fragment of amyloid precursor protein [sAPPβ], neurofilament light [NfL]) and core Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarkers (β-amyloid 1-42 , total tau, phosphorylated tau) in patients with FTLD-related clinical syndromes (n = 159): behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (n = 68), nonfluent (n = 23) and semantic (n = 19) variants of primary progressive aphasia, progressive supranuclear palsy (n = 28), and corticobasal syndrome (n = 21). We also included patients with AD (n = 72) and cognitively normal controls (CN; n = 76). We compared cross-sectional biomarker levels between groups, studied their correlation with cortical thickness, and evaluated their potential diagnostic utility. Results Patients with FTLD-related syndromes had lower levels of sAPPβ than CN and patients with AD. The levels of sAPPβ showed a strong correlation with cortical structural changes in frontal and cingulate areas. NfL and YKL-40 levels were high in both the FTLD and AD groups compared to controls. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the sAPPβ/YKL-40 and NfL/sAPPβ ratios had areas under the curve of 0.91 and 0.96, respectively, distinguishing patients with FTLD from CN, and of 0.84 and 0.85, distinguishing patients with FTLD from patients with AD. Conclusions The combination of sAPPβ with YKL-40 and with NfL in CSF could be useful to increase the certainty of the diagnosis of FTLD-related syndromes in clinical practice. Classification of evidence This study provides Class III evidence that CSF levels of sAPPβ, YKL-40, and NfL are useful to identify patients with FTLD-related syndromes.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Alcolea, D., Vilaplana, E., Suárez-Calvet, M., Illán-Gala, I., Blesa, R., Clarimón, J., et al. (2017). CSF sAPPβ, YKL-40, and neurofilament light in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000004088

Vancouver

Alcolea D, Vilaplana E, Suárez-Calvet M, Illán-Gala I, Blesa R, Clarimón J, et al. CSF sAPPβ, YKL-40, and neurofilament light in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology. 2017. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000004088. PMID: 28592456.

BibTeX

@article{alcolea2017-28592456,
  author  = {Alcolea, D. and Vilaplana, E. and Suárez-Calvet, M. and Illán-Gala, I. and Blesa, R. and Clarimón, J. and Lladó, A. and Sánchez-Valle, R. and others},
  title   = {{CSF sAPPβ, YKL-40, and neurofilament light in frontotemporal lobar degeneration}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2017},
  doi     = {10.1212/wnl.0000000000004088},
  pmid    = {28592456},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000004088}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this cross-sectional study, people with frontotemporal lobar degeneration-related syndromes had lower CSF sAPPβ than controls and people with Alzheimer's disease, while NfL and YKL-40 were high in both disease groups. These are biomarker differences for diagnosis, not evidence of a treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 61/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 61 of 100.61 of 100 points earned39 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2017 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 159 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 124 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 11.3 citations a year over 11 year(s) since 2017
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 11.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 12 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 22 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Alberto Lleó: h-index 92 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona: institution h-index 782 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 28592456)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 61 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 10 Oct 2026), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 13.

Later studies that cite this one

12 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “tdp-43”

1,150 studies in the library carry the topic tag “tdp-43”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,150 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →