Home › Research › Biomarkers
Correlation of serum complement factor 5a level with inflammatory response and cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease of different severity
Li Z, Wu H, Luo Y, Tan X.. BMC neurology, 2023-09-07
Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis
Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a common cause of dementia. Serum complement factor 5a (C5a) is exceedingly implicated in AD. We explored the role of C5a levels in AD patients of different severity. Methods Mild, moderate, and severe AD patients, and healthy controls were included. C5a and pro-inflammatory factor (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, CRP) levels were assessed by ELISA, and cognitive function was evaluated by Mini-Mental state examination (MMSE) score. The correlations between C5a, inflammatory factor levels, MMSE score, and plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio were analyzed by Pearson tests. Independent risk factors for AD aggravation were assessed by logistic multivariate regression analysis. According to the cut-off value of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of C5a level, AD patients were assigned into low/high expression groups, and severe AD incidence was compared. Severe AD cumulative incidence was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curve. Results Serum C5a, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and CRP levels were raised, and MMSE score was lowered in AD. Serum C5a, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and CRP levels in severe AD patients were higher than those in mild/moderate AD patients, but there were no significant differences in these cytokines between moderate and mild AD groups. The MMSE score of severe AD patients was lower than that of mild/moderate AD patients. Serum C5a level was positively correlated with serum TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and CRP levels, and negatively correlated with MMSE score, with no obvious correlation with plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio. Serum C5a level was one of the independent risk factors for AD aggravation. The occurrence of severe AD might be related to an increase in serum C5a level. Conclusion Serum C5a level increased with AD severity, and its expression was positively correlated with serum pro-inflammatory factor levels, and negatively correlated with cognitive function.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Li, Z., Wu, H., Luo, Y., & Tan, X. (2023). Correlation of serum complement factor 5a level with inflammatory response and cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease of different severity. BMC neurology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03256-w
Vancouver
Li Z, Wu H, Luo Y, Tan X. Correlation of serum complement factor 5a level with inflammatory response and cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease of different severity. BMC neurology. 2023. doi:10.1186/s12883-023-03256-w. PMID: 37679689.
BibTeX
@article{li2023-37679689,
author = {Li, Z. and Wu, H. and Luo, Y. and Tan, X.},
title = {{Correlation of serum complement factor 5a level with inflammatory response and cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease of different severity}},
journal = {BMC neurology},
year = {2023},
doi = {10.1186/s12883-023-03256-w},
pmid = {37679689},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-023-03256-w}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Results Serum C5a, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and CRP levels were raised, and MMSE score was lowered in AD.
- Serum C5a, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and CRP levels in severe AD patients were higher than those in mild/moderate AD patients, but there were no significant differences in these cytokines between moderate and mild AD groups.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Blood tests & biomarkers →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 43/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 25 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 43 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (BMC neurology) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 37679689) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 25 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 25 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 43 out of 100. |
| Total | 43 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Biomarkers
Also tagged “inflammatory-response”
3 studies in the library carry the topic tag “inflammatory-response”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 3 tagged studies.