27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Longitudinal cognitive testing is essential for developing novel preventive interventions for dementia and Alzheimer's disease; however, the few available tools have significant practice effect and depend on an external evaluator. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 50 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A previous report describes decreased decline in ADAS-cog (delta = 3.1, p = 0.008 at 18 months, ANCOVA with multiple imputation), relative to placebo, following a 5 mg/day dose of TTP488. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 399 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Issues with eating and drinking are often overlooked. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 29 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Patients with dementia with BD had a higher prevalence of comorbidities, greater use of comedications, and greater healthcare utilization and costs than patients with dementia without BD. 5 key findings →
Participants: 103,402 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Currently there are no disease-modifying treatments for Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD), a condition linked to aggregation of the protein α-synuclein in subcortical and cortical brain areas. 4 key findings →
Participants: 75 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Due to complex relationships of body-mass index and blood pressure with dementia individual components cancelled each other out and rendered the sum-scores meaningless for the prediction of dementia. 5 key findings →
Participants: 3,547 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We increased the findability, accessibility, interoperability and reusability (FAIR) status of the cohorts through harmonization of data across cohorts, implementation of medical imaging repositories for scan management, implementation of the Personal Health Train infrastructure and provision of meta-data in existing cohort catalogues. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The objective of this study was to analyze factors influencing the risk and timing of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in central Norway. 4 key findings →
Participants: 376 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our study is a unique resource of neuroimaging and cognitive measures relevant to change across the adult lifespan. 3 key findings →
Participants: 3,000 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia in the world and its prevalence is increasing and it has important public health consequences. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are non-cognitive symptoms commonly associated to Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,014 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
During lecanemab treatment for AD, it is essential to fully understand the mechanisms, imaging characteristics, and management strategies of ARIA. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Overall, 392 patients were enrolled in HARMONY; 49 patients with PDD and 27 patients with DLB were included in the open-label safety analysis, of whom 46 met response criteria and were randomized to receive pimavanserin (n = 22) or placebo (n = 24) during the double-blind period. 4 key findings →
Design: phase-3-trial Participants: 76 Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study utilized an initial dataset of 188,700 participant records from NACC. 5 key findings →
Participants: 16,309 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Amyloid imaging with PET and measuring cortical thickness with MRI are suitable biomarkers to detect disease progression in early AD within a small sample. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The reanalyzed study population (aged 70 year and above) was composed of Central and North-Eastern Spanish sub-populations obtained from 9 surveys and totaled 12,232 persons and 1,194 cases of dementia (707 of Alzheimer's disease, 238 of vascular dementia). 5 key findings →
Participants: 12,232 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In mild AD patients aged less than 75 years, the mean age-at-diagnosis of AD in APOE4 carriers was reduced by over 6 years in BCHE-K carriers versus noncarriers. 5 key findings →
Participants: 33 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
These findings indicate that although plasma and CSF neurogranin may reflect the volume of acute cerebral ischemia, this synaptic protein is less likely to be a potential AIS biomarker. 4 key findings →
Participants: 50 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The median (interquartile range) test time for MARC was 401 (350-453) s. Total MARC scores were significantly worse in the MCI and ADD groups than in the NDC group (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). 5 key findings →
Participants: 64 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Age and BMI were each associated with decreased brain volume. 3 key findings →
Participants: 114 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cognitive assessment is a basic element for dementia diagnosis. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Intervention and treatment in Alzheimer's disease dementia (AD-dementia) can be cost effective but the majority of patients are not diagnosed in a timely manner. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
388,899 deaths were included. Most people died in care homes (55.3%) or hospitals (39.6%). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Encouragingly, aspects of secondary prevention were identified that may be protective in reducing the incidence of cognitive impairment post-stroke. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The prevalence of cognitive impairment is higher in rural compared with urban populations. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →