Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 61 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Background Choline alfoscerate (alpha-glycerylphosphorylcholine) is a phospholipid that includes choline, which increases the release of acetylcholine. The ASCOMALVA trial, a combination of donepezil and choline alfoscerate, slowed cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease. This study aims to replicate the effect by combining donepezil with other nootropics currently used in South Korea. Methods The 119 patients with cognitive decline who were eligible to use donepezil, with an mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score of 26 or less, were assigned to: donepezil alone (DO); donepezil and choline alfoscerate (DN); donepezil and acetyl-l-carnitine (DA); or donepezil and ginkgo biloba extract (DG). Cognitive evaluations such as MMSE, clinical dementia rating, Alzheimer disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog), and Alzheimer disease assessment scale-noncognitive subscale were performed at the 12th and 24th weeks from the baseline time point. Results At the 12th week, the MMSE score increased 3.52% in the DN group, whereas it increased by 1.36% in the DO group. In the DA + DG group, it decreased by 2.17%. At the 24th week, the MMSE score showed an increase of 1.07% in the DO group and 1.61% in the DN group, but decreased by 5.71% in the DA + DG group. ADAS-Cog decreased by 0.9% in the DO group, while it improved by 13.9% in the DN group at the 12th week. At the 24th week, ADAS-Cog showed improvement in the DN group by 18.5%, whereas it improved by 9.4% in the DO group. Alzheimer disease assessment scale-noncognitive subscale also revealed better performance in the DN group than in the DO group at the 12th and 24th weeks. Conclusion Choline alfoscerate exhibits additional cognitive improvement in both cognitive and noncognitive domains, supporting the findings of the ASCOMALVA trial.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Lee, W., & Kim, M. (2024). Comparative study of choline alfoscerate as a combination therapy with donepezil: A mixed double-blind randomized controlled and open-label observation trial. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000038067

Vancouver

Lee W, Kim M. Comparative study of choline alfoscerate as a combination therapy with donepezil: A mixed double-blind randomized controlled and open-label observation trial. Medicine. 2024. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000038067. PMID: 38875437.

BibTeX

@article{lee2024-38875437,
  author  = {Lee, W. and Kim, M.},
  title   = {{Comparative study of choline alfoscerate as a combination therapy with donepezil: A mixed double-blind randomized controlled and open-label observation trial}},
  journal = {Medicine},
  year    = {2024},
  doi     = {10.1097/md.0000000000038067},
  pmid    = {38875437},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000038067}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Adding choline alfoscerate to donepezil was linked to better memory and noncognitive scores than donepezil alone at 12 and 24 weeks in this small 119-patient trial. It does not show a cure or prevention, and the comparison with other nootropics was less clear.

Study details

How this study scored 61/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 2 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 61 of 100.61 of 100 points earned39 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Medicine)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Medicine: journal h-index 285 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial (from PubMed type “Randomized Controlled Trial”)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 119 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 2 / 2 Randomised and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 9 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.2 citations a year over 4 year(s) since 2024
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 9 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Manho Kim: h-index 67 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Seoul National University: institution h-index 1,053 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 38875437)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 61 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “double-blind”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “double-blind”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →